动物有道德吗？
Can animals be moral?
Mark Rowlands · 初版 2012 年
1人推荐
2位读者提及
2次提及
立足于行为学证据，本书展开了细致入微的哲学分析与论证，判定动物确实可以具备道德。动物能够出于道德原因而行动，就此意义而言它们可以具备道德行为。或者至少，在逻辑上并不存在任何不可逾越的阻碍来反对这种假设。这一结论不仅对我们理解动物具有重大意义，对我们用来理解人类道德生活的核心概念（如动机、行动和能动性）同样影响深远。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Rowlands 写的《Can animals be moral?》（动物能有道德吗？）https://www.amazon.com/Can-Animals-Moral-Mark-Rowlands/dp/01... 还有 Kohut 的《Analysis of the Self》（自我的分析）https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Self-Psychoanalytic-Narcissi... 这本读起来挺吃力的……
Can animals be moral? by Rowlands https://www.amazon.com/Can-Animals-Moral-Mark-Rowlands/dp/01... Also Analysis of the Self by Kohut https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Self-Psychoanalytic-Narcissi... which is difficult going…
> 邪恶 > 极其不道德和恶劣。我觉得动物是否能有道德/不道德本身就已经是哲学议题了。具体可以参考《Can Animals Be Moral?》这本书。要说这些猴子是邪恶的，你首先得证明它们能具备道德。
> evil > profoundly immoral and wicked. I think the concept that animal can be moral / immoral is already a philosophical subject. See the book "Can Animals Be Moral?" for reference. And in order to say that these monkeys are evil, you must first prove that they can be moral.