……物理学你必须理解背后的形式体系（formalism）到底是怎么回事，而物理学家却没法用大白话解释清楚，其中的原因我隐约能看出来，但又很难准确表达出来。作为另一条途径，《Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision》[1] 的学习曲线可能会平缓一些，因为“你自己就是那个量子系统”，所以你能真切体验到这本书里讨论的现象。为了消除这里带出的一点 new-age 味道……
…physics you have to know what the formalism behind are about and physicists are unable to explain it in simple terms for reasons I think I make out but can't properly formulate. As an alternative path, Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision [1], may offer a less steep learning curve for the fact "you are the quantum system" and as such get to have actual experience with phenomena discussed in this book. To clear up the new-age vibe introduced…
……STONE’ 变得讲得通。因此更好的办法是把两者都当作实体，针对两个实体的情况使用 Fock space，放弃那种把其中一个仅仅当作上下文（context）的较简单模型。原汁原味（Vanilla）的认知与决策量子模型是不够的。人们真正需要的是量子场论（Quantum Field Theory）认知与决策模型。“需要量子场论的真实结构来使预测与实验数据相吻合。”https://arxiv.org/pdf/0705.1740
…STONE’ make sense. Hence a better approach is to consider both as entities, and use Fock space for a two entity situation, and forgo the more simple model of considering one of them as a context. Vanilla Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision are not enough. One really needs Quantum Field Theory Models of Cognition and Decision. "The genuine structure of quantum field theory is needed to match predictions with experimental data." https://arxiv.org/pdf/0705.1740
……物理学你必须理解背后的形式体系（formalism）到底是怎么回事，而物理学家却没法用大白话解释清楚，其中的原因我隐约能看出来，但又很难准确表达出来。作为另一条途径，《Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision》[1] 的学习曲线可能会平缓一些，因为“你自己就是那个量子系统”，所以你能真切体验到这本书里讨论的现象。为了消除这里带出的一点 new-age 味道……
…physics you have to know what the formalism behind are about and physicists are unable to explain it in simple terms for reasons I think I make out but can't properly formulate. As an alternative path, Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision [1], may offer a less steep learning curve for the fact "you are the quantum system" and as such get to have actual experience with phenomena discussed in this book. To clear up the new-age vibe introduced…
……STONE’ 变得讲得通。因此更好的办法是把两者都当作实体，针对两个实体的情况使用 Fock space，放弃那种把其中一个仅仅当作上下文（context）的较简单模型。原汁原味（Vanilla）的认知与决策量子模型是不够的。人们真正需要的是量子场论（Quantum Field Theory）认知与决策模型。“需要量子场论的真实结构来使预测与实验数据相吻合。”https://arxiv.org/pdf/0705.1740
…STONE’ make sense. Hence a better approach is to consider both as entities, and use Fock space for a two entity situation, and forgo the more simple model of considering one of them as a context. Vanilla Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision are not enough. One really needs Quantum Field Theory Models of Cognition and Decision. "The genuine structure of quantum field theory is needed to match predictions with experimental data." https://arxiv.org/pdf/0705.1740