科技想要什么
What technology wants
Kevin Kelly · 初版 2010 年
24人推荐
48位读者提及
63次提及
为什么值得读
- 论证技术演进与诸多科学突破具有历史必然性
- 提出对新科技采取审慎接纳的态度以防滥用
- 深入探讨涌现行为对科学发展的推动作用
一本引人入胜、富有创新精神且乐观的著作，探讨了人性与技术如何携手在世界上创造越来越多的机遇，以及技术如何赋予我们的生命更深远的意义。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
What technology wants
Kevin Kelly · 初版 2010 年
一本引人入胜、富有创新精神且乐观的著作，探讨了人性与技术如何携手在世界上创造越来越多的机遇，以及技术如何赋予我们的生命更深远的意义。
正在加载完整评论……
这就慢慢沦落为卢德主义了。说正经的：我认为需要有一场自下而上的草根推动，去采取一种极其审慎的选择性技术采纳方式，就像 Kevin Kelly 在他的书《What Technology Wants》中所描述的那样。如果大家在面对新应用和新设备时，普遍抱有一种怀疑的态度——‘这玩意儿对我有什么用？’，那么面对大型科技公司滥用权力时，或许就能形成更强的群体免疫（比如 Google 窃取……
So begins the slow descent into Luddism. Seriously now: I think there needs to be a grassroots push for a vety selective approach to technology adoption as described by Kevin Kelly in his book What Technology Wants. If people generally treated new apps and devices with a skeptical 'what does this do for me?' attitude, there might be more herd immunity against abuses of power by large tech firms (Google's stealing…
Kevin Kelly 在《What Technology Wants》[1] 里对此有个很有意思的见解。本质上就是——这类作品/成就是不可避免的。就算库布里克、盖茨或贝佐斯没有拍出《2001太空漫游》、创立微软或亚马逊，别人也会做出来的。当然不会*一模一样*，但肯定会有类似的……
Kevin Kelly has an interesting take on this in _What Technology Wants_ [1]. Essentially - that these sort of works were inevitable. If Kubrick, Gates, or Bezos hadn't made 2001, MS, or AMZ - someone else would have. Not _exactly_ the same thing of course, but something…
这是对 Kevin Kelly 的《What Technology Wants》一篇很有见地的书评。这本书本身非常引人深思，以至于我大概一个月前读完后一直回味至今。这篇书评里的批评确实很中肯，这也是……
This is a thoughtful review of Kevin Kelly's "What Technology Wants." The book itself is very thought-provoking, so much so that I haven't stopped thinking about it since reading it a month or so ago. The criticisms in this review are certainly valid, and this is one…
……20世纪初的物理学；他又不是凭一己之力从洞穴壁画跨越到狭义相对论的。你其他的例子根本和科学进步无关。你应该去读读《What Technology Wants》。开头一两章确实有点逻辑跳跃，但书的其余部分有力地证明了正是涌现行为（emergent behavior）促成了我们绝大多数的科研成果。
…physics near the turn of the 20th century; he didn't go from cave painting to special relativity all on his own. The rest of your examples have nothing to do with scientific advancement. You should read What Technology Wants. The first chapter or two contains a few leaps of logic, but the rest of the book makes a compelling case for emergent behavior leading to most of our scientific results.
……这是哪本书里的吗？我敢发誓绝对在哪儿读到过，但这儿也没注明出处。edit/update：啊，好吧，原来是来自 Kevin Kelly 的网站，他就是《What Technology Wants》（http://www.kk.org/books/what-technology-wants.php）的作者，那本书里有这段话或者类似的内容。书还不错。
…this from some book? could have sworn i had read this somewhere, but no credit is given here. edit/update: ah, ok, so this is from kevin kelly's site, and he's the author of http://www.kk.org/books/what-technology-wants.php which contains either this text or something similar. not a bad book.
……今年花时间学习技术以外的东西，对我来说这时间花得太值了。以下是我今年最喜欢的几本书：- 《Currency Wars》，James Rickards - 《The Shock Doctrine》，Naomi Klein - 《What Technology Wants》，Kevin Kelly - 《The Art Of Happiness》，Dalai Lama - 《Lies My Teacher Told Me》，James Loewen - 《The Four Agreements》，Miguel Ruiz - 《Man's Search For Meaning》，Viktor Frankl - 《Understanding Power》，Noam Chomsky……
…Using this year to learn things outside of technology has been time very well spent for me. Here are some of my top books this year. - Currency Wars, James Rickards - The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein - What Technology Wants, Kevin Kelly - The Art Of Happiness, Dalai Lama - Lies My Teacher Told Me, James Loewen - The Four Agreements, Miguel Ruiz - Man's Search For Meaning, Viktor Frankl - Understanding Power, Noam Chomsky…