知识的边界
Too big to know
David Weinberger · 初版 2012 年
1人推荐
3位读者提及
4次提及
我们曾经懂得如何获取认知。我们从书籍或专家那里寻求答案。我们敲定事实，然后继续前行。但在互联网时代，知识已迁移至网络。知识固然比以往任何时候都更加丰富，但它已变得截然不同。话题不再有边界，且没有人能在任何事情上达成共识。然而，如果你懂得方法，这便是历史上成为求知者的最好时代。在 Too Big to Know 中，互联网哲学家 David Weinberger 阐述了商业、科学、教育和政府如何学会利用网络化知识来获得前所未有的深刻理解，并做出比以往更明智的决策……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……促使我深入去研究我的文档网站各个页面之间是如何相互关联的，并且收获了一些很有价值的洞见：https://technicalwriting.dev/data/intertwingularity.html （是 Baker 的书引导我读到了《Too Big To Know》，而这本书又进一步把我带到了“intertwingularity”（相互缠绕性）这个概念面前）
…inspired me to deep-dive into how the pages of my docs site relate to each other, which yielded some useful insights: https://technicalwriting.dev/data/intertwingularity.html (Baker's book led me to Too Big To Know, which in turn led me to the concept of intertwingularity)
哇，太酷了！感谢您写了这本书，很高兴认识您。鉴于生成式 AI（GenAI）正在如此剧烈地重塑数据/信息/知识/智慧的格局，是不是该来一本《Too Big To Know 2.0》了？另：在接下来的一个会议演讲中，我正准备引用您关于“网络化知识”的概念，和我……
Oh wow, cool! Thanks for writing the book and nice to meet you. Maybe it's time for Too Big To Know 2.0 given how GenAI is changing the data / information / knowledge / wisdom landscape so much? P.S. I am referencing your concept of networked knowledge in an upcoming conference presentation with my…
……“大洪水过后的几个世纪里，但数量可能再也没达到过曾经的盛况。没人确切知道它们到底是在什么时候彻底灭绝的。”David Weinberger 在他的《Too Big To Know》一书中探讨过这类现象。
…centuries after the Flood, but probably never in the great numbers that there once had been. No one knows exactly when they finally died out." David Weinberger talks about phenomena such as this in his book Too Big To Know.
嗨。我是《Too Big to Know》的作者，你的帖子把我与这个讨论串、这些书以及你紧紧“缠绕”（intertwingled）在了一起。（注：我把 Google Alerts 和自我虚荣心的抚慰，视作践行 Ted Nelson 提出的 intertwingularity 概念的一种充满讽刺意味的媒介。）
Hi. I wrote Too Big to Know, and your post intertwingled me with this thread, these books, and you. (Note: I'm taking Google Alerts & Ego Salve as an ironic agent of Ted Nelson's concept of intertwingularity.)