……直觉上很明确，“网络行动（cyber operations）”完全可能构成战争行为的一部分。[1] 因此实施者就是战斗人员，也是合法的打击目标。但自从读了 P.W. Singer 的《Wired for War》之后，我强烈感觉到大家对“网络”和无人机作战的二阶效应（second order effects）考虑得相当不充分。举个例子，按这个标准无人机飞手就是战斗人员。而这就降低了……
…intuitively quite clear, that it is possible for 'cyber operations' to be part of acts of war. [1] And the perpetrators are therefore combatants and legitimate targets. But since I read P.W. Singer's Wired for war I have the strong feeling that the second order effects of 'cyber' and drone operations are quite poorly thought out. So for example a drone pilot is by this standard a combatant. And this reduces the…
“《Wired for War》这本重量级新书的作者 P.W. Singer 告诉我：‘我们正处于历史的转折点。美国空军今年培训的无人系统操作员数量，将超过战斗机和轰炸机飞行员的总和。而且，正如比尔·盖茨指出的那样，机器人技术正……
"P.W. Singer, the author of an important new book called Wired for War, told me that, 'We are at a breakpoint in history. The U.S. air force this year will train more unmanned system pilots than fighter and bomber pilots combined. And, as Bill Gates has noted, robotics are…
让我想起了其他安全技术的平民化/普及（democratization），就像 P. W. Singer 的《Wired for War》http://amzn.to/gSsI 里描述的那样，甚至可能就像 Chris Anderson 的 DIY Drones：http://DIYDrones.com 一样。
Reminds me of the democratization other security technologies such as described in: P. W. Singer's "Wired for War" http://amzn.to/gSsI Perhaps even Chris Anderson's DIY Drones: http://DIYDrones.com
……正在为一个几乎完全自主的机器人在战争中扮演核心角色的未来做准备。(56) 因此，军方在机器人技术上投入的金钱和精力是最多的。” (54)。[P.W. Singer，《Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century》（2009）]，见前注 20，第 78 页（指出“军方主导着 AI 的发展议程”）。
…preparing for a future in which nearly autonomous robots will play a central role in warfare.(56) Consequently, the military is spending the most money and attention on robotics." (54). [P.W. Singer, Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century (2009)], supra note 20, at 78 (observing that the “military sets the agenda in AI”).
《Wired for War》这本书也很赞。
The book Wired for War is also good.
《Wired for War》是 2009 年出的，如果你刚接触这个领域，我建议读一下。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_for_War
Wired for War came out in 2009 and if you are new to this topic I would recommend giving it a read. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_for_War
……直觉上很明确，“网络行动（cyber operations）”完全可能构成战争行为的一部分。[1] 因此实施者就是战斗人员，也是合法的打击目标。但自从读了 P.W. Singer 的《Wired for War》之后，我强烈感觉到大家对“网络”和无人机作战的二阶效应（second order effects）考虑得相当不充分。举个例子，按这个标准无人机飞手就是战斗人员。而这就降低了……
…intuitively quite clear, that it is possible for 'cyber operations' to be part of acts of war. [1] And the perpetrators are therefore combatants and legitimate targets. But since I read P.W. Singer's Wired for war I have the strong feeling that the second order effects of 'cyber' and drone operations are quite poorly thought out. So for example a drone pilot is by this standard a combatant. And this reduces the…
“《Wired for War》这本重量级新书的作者 P.W. Singer 告诉我：‘我们正处于历史的转折点。美国空军今年培训的无人系统操作员数量，将超过战斗机和轰炸机飞行员的总和。而且，正如比尔·盖茨指出的那样，机器人技术正……
"P.W. Singer, the author of an important new book called Wired for War, told me that, 'We are at a breakpoint in history. The U.S. air force this year will train more unmanned system pilots than fighter and bomber pilots combined. And, as Bill Gates has noted, robotics are…
让我想起了其他安全技术的平民化/普及（democratization），就像 P. W. Singer 的《Wired for War》http://amzn.to/gSsI 里描述的那样，甚至可能就像 Chris Anderson 的 DIY Drones：http://DIYDrones.com 一样。
Reminds me of the democratization other security technologies such as described in: P. W. Singer's "Wired for War" http://amzn.to/gSsI Perhaps even Chris Anderson's DIY Drones: http://DIYDrones.com
……正在为一个几乎完全自主的机器人在战争中扮演核心角色的未来做准备。(56) 因此，军方在机器人技术上投入的金钱和精力是最多的。” (54)。[P.W. Singer，《Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century》（2009）]，见前注 20，第 78 页（指出“军方主导着 AI 的发展议程”）。
…preparing for a future in which nearly autonomous robots will play a central role in warfare.(56) Consequently, the military is spending the most money and attention on robotics." (54). [P.W. Singer, Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century (2009)], supra note 20, at 78 (observing that the “military sets the agenda in AI”).