请理解我
Please understand me
David Keirsey · 初版 1984 年
1人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及
在简要梳理了 20 世纪的心理学运动之后，Keirsey 和 Bates 鼓励你完成包含 70 道题的“Keirsey Temperament Sorter”，这是一种类似小型 Myers-Briggs 的测试，可将你归入 16 种人格类型之一。与 Myers-Briggs 系统一样，该测试将你的人格划分为外向/内向（E/I）、感觉/直觉（S/N）、思考/情感（T/F）以及感知/判断（P/J）等维度。与 Myers-Briggs 系统不同的是，Please Understand Me 还提出了四种易于记忆的气质类型——狄奥尼索斯型（自由至上）、埃庇米修斯型（渴望有用）、普罗米
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……交流。看书会比做网上的测试更好，因为重点应该是去了解所有其他人格类型以及它们之间是如何互动的，而不是仅仅了解你自己。http://www.amazon.com/Please-Understand-Me-Character-Tempera...
…talk. A book would be better than an online test because the point should be to learn about all the other personality types, and how they interact, rather than understand your own. http://www.amazon.com/Please-Understand-Me-Character-Tempera...
那些画像似乎更多是由凯尔西气质类型的相关材料（比如《请理解我》）推广开来的。相比大五人格（Big 5），它们的存在甚至可以被看作是 MBTI 的一个劣势，因为它们夸大了测量和/或维度的实际意义。{ 这些画像对各种……“过度解读”了
The profiles seem more propagated by Keirsey Temperament type material (e.g. Please Understand Me). Their existence could be viewed as more of a downside of MB relative to Big 5 because they exaggerate the meaning of the measurement and/or category. { These profiles "read a lot into" the various…
……内外之别更多是一种天生气质，而不是某种神经多样性（neurodivergence）。例如，你所描述的，基本就是凯尔西在《请理解我》中描述的具体思维与抽象思维的典型体现。如果你是一群偏好具体思维的人里唯一的抽象思维者，确实会感觉有点被孤立；而如果相信他的统计数据，你很有可能会经常发现自己处于那种境地……
…versus inside-out is more of a temperament than it is a form of neurodivergence. For example, what you're describing is basically typical of how Keirsey describes concrete versus abstract reasoning in Please Understand Me. And it could be kind of alienating to be the one abstract reasoner in a group of concrete reasoners and if you believe his statistics it's kind of likely that you'll find yourself in that situation a…
……我猜就像个转接头。你的大脑底层原生就是以某种特定方式编码的。> 例如，你所描述的，基本就是凯尔西在《请理解我》中描述的具体思维与抽象思维的典型体现。如果你是一群偏好具体思维的人里唯一的抽象思维者，确实会感觉有点被孤立；而如果相信他的统计数据，你很有可能会经常发现自己处于那种境地……
…an adapter, I suppose. Your brain just still is coded a certain way natively. > or example, what you're describing is basically typical of how Keirsey describes concrete versus abstract reasoning in Please Understand Me. And it could be kind of alienating to be the one abstract reasoner in a group of concrete reasoners and if you believe his statistics it's kind of likely that you'll find yourself in that situation a…