这种趋势可以一路追溯到 50 年前，有人说是从二战后 DoD（美国国防部）资助体系建立开始的。推荐读读 Paula Stephan 的《How Economics Shapes Science》[1]，能全面了解你提到的待遇过低以及预算不断增加的双重趋势。（说到底，钱都流向了前面提到的行政管理成本，导致机构不断扩张……
This is a trend that stretches well back 50 years, some say to the establishment of the postwar DoD funding system. I recommend Paula Stephan's How Economics Shapes Science[1] for a comprehensive view of both the underpaid and increasing budget trends you mention. (The bottom line is that the money goes to administration costs as mentioned, leading institutions to expand…
I'd recommend the following book: How Economics Shapes Science https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Shapes-Science-Paula-Stepha... It looks into key challenges of the scientific labor market.
说得太对了——在《How Economics Shapes Science》中，科学经济学家 Paula Stephan 反复讨论了这个问题。同行评审（peer review）领域一个始料未及的问题是，与以往相比，老教授们退休的年龄越来越晚……
A great point -- in "How Economics Shapes Science," science economist Paula Stephan talks about this problem repeatedly. One of the unforeseen problems in the peer review space is that older professors retire later and later in life compared to previous…
> 这早就不是什么新鲜事了。感谢你提出这一点（还结合了你自己 20 多年前的亲身经历！）。自从读了 Paula Stephan 在《How Economics Shapes Science》里的研究[1]以来，我这些年一直在大声疾呼这件事。博士生产过剩、教授推迟退休、以及争抢基金资助的机构不断增加，这些问题早在 1980 年代就已经众所周知了，而且从那时起这一趋势就一直在单调递增。[1]……
>This is nothing new. Thank you for bringing up this point (and speaking to it personally from 20+ years ago!). I have been beating this drum for years since I've read Paula Stephan's research[1] on "How Economics Shapes Science." The overproduction of PhDs, the delaying of retirement by professors, and the addition of institutions to grant funding have been known since the 1980s, and the trend has been linear since then. [1]…
这种趋势可以一路追溯到 50 年前，有人说是从二战后 DoD（美国国防部）资助体系建立开始的。推荐读读 Paula Stephan 的《How Economics Shapes Science》[1]，能全面了解你提到的待遇过低以及预算不断增加的双重趋势。（说到底，钱都流向了前面提到的行政管理成本，导致机构不断扩张……
This is a trend that stretches well back 50 years, some say to the establishment of the postwar DoD funding system. I recommend Paula Stephan's How Economics Shapes Science[1] for a comprehensive view of both the underpaid and increasing budget trends you mention. (The bottom line is that the money goes to administration costs as mentioned, leading institutions to expand…
我推荐下面这本书：《How Economics Shapes Science》https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Shapes-Science-Paula-Stepha... 它深入剖析了科研人才市场的关键挑战。
I'd recommend the following book: How Economics Shapes Science https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Shapes-Science-Paula-Stepha... It looks into key challenges of the scientific labor market.
说得太对了——在《How Economics Shapes Science》中，科学经济学家 Paula Stephan 反复讨论了这个问题。同行评审（peer review）领域一个始料未及的问题是，与以往相比，老教授们退休的年龄越来越晚……
A great point -- in "How Economics Shapes Science," science economist Paula Stephan talks about this problem repeatedly. One of the unforeseen problems in the peer review space is that older professors retire later and later in life compared to previous…
> 这早就不是什么新鲜事了。感谢你提出这一点（还结合了你自己 20 多年前的亲身经历！）。自从读了 Paula Stephan 在《How Economics Shapes Science》里的研究[1]以来，我这些年一直在大声疾呼这件事。博士生产过剩、教授推迟退休、以及争抢基金资助的机构不断增加，这些问题早在 1980 年代就已经众所周知了，而且从那时起这一趋势就一直在单调递增。[1]……
>This is nothing new. Thank you for bringing up this point (and speaking to it personally from 20+ years ago!). I have been beating this drum for years since I've read Paula Stephan's research[1] on "How Economics Shapes Science." The overproduction of PhDs, the delaying of retirement by professors, and the addition of institutions to grant funding have been known since the 1980s, and the trend has been linear since then. [1]…