感官的魔力
The spell of the sensuous
David Abram · 初版 1996 年
8人推荐
9位读者提及
11次提及
[在本书中，作者]广泛取材于 Merleau-Ponty 哲学、巴厘岛萨满教、阿帕契族民间叙事以及自身作为手法精湛的魔术师的亲身经历，以此揭示人类认知对自然环境的微妙依赖。他探究了感知的本质，挖掘了语言的感官基石——即使在最抽象的语境下，语言也依然回荡着大地的呼唤与呐喊。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
The spell of the sensuous
David Abram · 初版 1996 年
[在本书中，作者]广泛取材于 Merleau-Ponty 哲学、巴厘岛萨满教、阿帕契族民间叙事以及自身作为手法精湛的魔术师的亲身经历，以此揭示人类认知对自然环境的微妙依赖。他探究了感知的本质，挖掘了语言的感官基石——即使在最抽象的语境下，语言也依然回荡着大地的呼唤与呐喊。
正在加载完整评论……
……仅凭一份摘要就下断言。换个角度来看，我很欣赏（尽管不太确定该如何评价）David Abram 在《Becoming Animal》以及（尤其是）《The Spell of the Sensuous》中对启蒙运动的批判。他真正的批判目标其实是脱离肉身的/符号化的思维本身，但启蒙运动或许可以被视为人类认知史中那一路线的（自封的）胜利。
…a judgement on the basis of a summary. From another angle, I enjoy (if don't quite know what to make of) David Abram's critique of the Enlightenment in his Becoming Animal and (more particularly) The Spell of the Sensuous. His target is really disembodied/symbolic thinking as such, but the Enlightenment might be considered a (proclaimed) victory of that line of human cognitive history.
有一本 David Abram 写的书叫《The Spell of the Sensuous》，还有一本续作叫《Becoming Animal》，我觉得挺切题的。它们不是基于神经科学，而是哲学（主要是梅洛-庞蒂的现象学，加上一点麦克卢汉，还有一些有趣的……
There's a book called The Spell of the Sensuous by David Abram, and a sequel called Becoming Animal, that I think are relevant. They aren't based on neuroscience but philosophy (mostly Merleau-Ponty phenomenology, a little bit of McLuhan, plus an interesting…
想要了解现象学层面的探讨，可以看看 David Abram 的《The Spell of the Sensuous》。意识在整个世界中以梯度形式存在的观点并不新鲜。现代工业文明对心智的构想（又刚被科技革命改造）规定了……
For a phenomenological treatment, see The Spell of the Sensuous by David Abram. The idea that consciousness exists throughout the world as a gradient is not new. The modern industrial conception of mind (newly transformed by the technological revolution) prescribes…
我同意。你应该去看看大卫·阿布拉姆（David Abram）写的《成为动物》（Becoming Animal）和《感官的幽咒》（The Spell of the Sensuous）这两本书。
I agree. You should check out “Becoming Animal” and “The Spell of the Sensuous”, both by David Abram
David Abram 1996 年出版的《The Spell of the Sensuous》是个不错的切入点。这也是已故的 John Moriarty 许多作品的核心主题（不过在我看来，他的切入方式比 Abram 更加迂回且整体化）。这根衣钵后来被……接了过去。
David Abram's 1996 book The Spell of the Sensuous a good starting point. This was also a central theme in a lot of the late John Moriarty's work (although approached more obliquely and holistically than Abram imo). That mantle has been picked up by…
……字母本身与它们所描述的事物完全风马牛不相及。它们可能是人类历史上最早以这种方式运作的物体之一……不管怎么说，这本书叫《The Spell of the Sensuous》，信息量极其硬核（dense af），但充满了极其精彩的探索思路。
…The letters themselves are completely different from the things they are describing. And they might be one of the first objects in human history that work like this... Anyway, the book is called the Spell of the Sensuous, and it's dense af, but bursting with fascinating lines of inquiry.