自由的未来
The future of freedom
Fareed Zakaria · 初版 2003 年
2人推荐
6位读者提及
11次提及
考察了民主对世界不同地区政治、商业与经济、法律、文化及宗教的影响；探讨了民主进程的阴暗面；并对全球民主的未来进行了反思。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
The future of freedom
Fareed Zakaria · 初版 2003 年
考察了民主对世界不同地区政治、商业与经济、法律、文化及宗教的影响；探讨了民主进程的阴暗面；并对全球民主的未来进行了反思。
正在加载完整评论……
……由伊斯兰主义者统治的民主制度，他们正在践踏自由、掏空公民社会，把这个国家变成逊尼派版的阿亚图拉伊朗。法里德·扎卡里亚（Fareed Zakaria）有本很棒的书叫《自由的未来》（The Future of Freedom），他在里面探讨了非自由民主（illiberal democracy）的种种危害。让我印象特别深的一点是他的论点：公正的法官是一项比选票更重要的制度……
…democracy ruled by Islamists who are destroying liberties, hollowing out civil society, and turning the country into a Sunni version of Iran under the Ayatollahs. Fareed Zakaria has a great book, The Future of Freedom, where he discusses, among other things, the perils of illiberal democracy. The bit that really stuck in my head is his argument that the impartial judge is a more important institution than the ballot…
……阻止瓦哈比派毛拉彻底掌权。自由民主制度如今并不是放在哪儿都能起作用，我们在伊拉克那场彻底被误导的实验就已经证明了这点。关于这个问题的探讨，我推荐法里德·扎卡里亚的《自由的未来》，但极简总结一下就是：没有实质性的经济发展，你就不可能拥有一个正常运作的民主制度（出于各种原因，靠自然资源得来的钱根本不算）……
…keeping the Wahhabist mullahs from taking over completely. Liberal democracy will not work everywhere today, as our horribly misguided experiment in Iraq has demonstrated. I recommend Fareed Zakaria's The Future of Freedom for a discussion of the problem, but a very short summary is that you cannot have a functioning democracy without substantial economic development (natural resource money does NOT count for many reasons)…
……让人困惑的是，正如罗德里格斯（Rodriguez）和萨曼（Samman）所指出的，这些国家在民主化方面取得的进展远没有那么多。”想了解更多关于这种现象的内容，可以去读读法里德·扎卡里亚的佳作《自由的未来：国内外的非自由民主》（The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad）
…puzzling, as Rodriguez and Samman also note, is that these countries have not made nearly as much progress in democratization." You can read more on this phenomena in Fareed Zakaria's excellent book, "The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad"
……这就是为什么他们起初希望把医保辩论放在闭门会议里进行——游说客利用“透明度”的能力可比毫不关心的普通选民强多了。法里德·扎卡里亚在《自由的未来：国内外的非自由民主》里对这点写过很多。{1} [卡罗尔·伯金《绝妙的解决方案：美国宪法的诞生》]
…is why they initially wanted health care debates behind closed doors - the lobbyists can make much more use of transparency than the uninterested voter can. Fareed Zakaria wrote a lot about this in The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. {1} [A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution by Carol Berkin]
……现在的孟加拉国也可以作为这方面的一个例子。如果你举例的国家在东欧，我觉得你可能忽略了关键的差异。法里德·扎卡里亚在他的书《自由的未来》（the Future of Freedom）中探讨过这一点。https://www.amazon.com/Future-Freedom-Illiberal-Democracy-Re.... 他解释说，自由民主制度的许多基石实际上是在专制政权时期奠定的：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Future_of_Freedom.…
…Bangladesh these days as an example of that also. If the country you’re using as an example is in Eastern Europe, I think you may be overlooking key differences. Fareed Zakaria addresses this in his book “the Future of Freedom.” https://www.amazon.com/Future-Freedom-Illiberal-Democracy-Re.... He explains that many of the foundations of liberal democracy were put in place during autocratic regimes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Future_of_Freedom.…
……这就是为什么他们起初希望把医保辩论放在闭门会议里进行——游说客利用“透明度”的能力可比毫不关心的普通选民强多了。法里德·扎卡里亚在《自由的未来：国内外的非自由民主》里对这点写过很多。[卡罗尔·伯金《绝妙的解决方案：美国宪法的诞生》]
…is why they initially wanted health care debates behind closed doors - the lobbyists can make much more use of transparency than the uninterested voter can. Fareed Zakaria wrote a lot about this in The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. [A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution by Carol Berkin]