资产阶级的尊严
Bourgeois dignity
Deirdre N. McCloskey · 初版 2010 年
3人推荐
4位读者提及
13次提及
Bourgeois Dignity将目光投向17和18世纪的欧洲，重新审视工业革命的诞生与资本主义的兴起。根据McCloskey的观点，我们的现代世界并非新市场或帝国掠夺的产物，而是源于对经济看法的转变。有关私有财产、商业、创新与资产阶级的言论发生了翻天覆地的变化，变得更为赞许，并打破了延续数千年的偏见。因此，1800年之后国家财富的惊人增长并非由经济因素促成；它的增长源于关于市场的修辞，
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
写得很棒的评论。顺便问下，你读过 Deirdre McCloskey 吗？我最近一直在读她的《Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World》，觉得特别有意思。经济学是一门社会科学，进行测量/积累数据并根据数据建构理论，本身就会导致行为改变。……
Great comment. Incidentally, have you come across Deirdre Mccloskey, I've been reading her book 'Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World' and finding it really interesting. Economics is a social science, taking measurements / accumulating data and theorising on that data causes changes in behaviour.…
……想要赚钱和搞创新是完全没问题的（这在当时还是个新观念）。如果不这么想，你要么是活在1800年之前，要么是活在瑞典。如果你想了解更多，我推荐 Deirdre McCloskey 写的《Bourgeois Dignity: A Revolution in Rhetoric》这本书。
…is OK to want to make money and to innovate (it was a new idea at the time). To think otherwise places you either back before 1800 or in Sweden. If you would like to learn more I recommend the book "Bourgeois Dignity: A Revolution in Rhetoric" by Deirdre McCloskey.
> 这种商品的出口驱动了英国，乃至更广泛的各大帝国列强，并且在这些国家创造了富裕的经济。Deirdre N. McCloskey 在她的书《Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World》里很透彻地解释了：单凭这种帝国贸易（以及其他因素），根本不足以解释为什么西方会变得如此富裕。引用一下……
> This exporting of goods is what drove the British, and the Imperial powers in general, and what produced a wealthy economy in those countries. Deirdre N. McCloskey in her book 'Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World' does a pretty good job of explaining that this imperial trade (amongst other factors) doesn't do enough to explain why The West became wealthy. To quote…
……物品属于他们的生存需求，然后拿去交易。这引发了各种担忧，也给很多人带来了巨大压力。把锅甩给“资本”似乎相当不妥。Deirdre McCloskey 在她的书《Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World》里，非常有说服力地把这种观点驳斥为一种谬论。资本的积累和使用本身并不是坏事。究竟带来了多少好处……
…things being their survival needs and go on to trade them. This raises all sorts of concerns and has cause many a lot of stress. Blaming 'capital' seems fairly erroneous. Deirdre Mccloskey, in her book 'Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World' has a very convincing go at turning the idea into a fallacy. The accumulation and use of capital isn't, in and of itself, a bad thing. How much good has…
我最近读了 Deirdre McCloskey 的《Bourgeois Dignity》这本书，它提出了一个颇为类似的论点，并且有扎实的历史研究作为支撑。这本书的核心论点是：搞发明、做生意、“发家致富”的尊严与体面……
I recently read the book "Bourgeois Dignity" by Dierdre McCloskey, and it makes a somewhat similar argument backed up by serious historical research. The thesis of the book is that the respectability of inventing, doing business, "getting rich"…
……城市变得更好。地主保住了自己的土地，并购买机械来进行耕作。平民在公地劳作已经是极为久远的事了。建议你看看 Deirdre N. McCloskey 的《Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World》，它在破除各种经济学神话方面写得相当到位。
…cities to be better. Lander owners kept their land and bought machinery to work it. It's been a very long time since the common people worked the commons. Suggest you have a look at Deirde N. McCloskey's 'Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World', it does a decent job of dispelling every economic myth.