…we should support modern day Marxists (and non-Marxian Communists), anarchists and Communalists in their research and investigation into advancing their hypothesis. A good read on this is Badiou's The Communist Hypothesis.
…that, if they talk in favour of it, they have a different idea of Communism to you? Modern Communist academics do, we must investigate the ontology of Communism; a good read on this is from Badiou, The Communist Hypothesis. Most modern academic Communists believe that we must search for what happened, how to prevent it and how to move past it, to say nothing of the various splinters and brothers in the Communist family…
…Communism, within academia the meaning of Communism can be stretched much father than you may have anticipated; Badiou writes, "where there is a State, there is Communism to oppose it". This is known as the Communist hypothesis. On to the definiton of capitalism, the main factor is the private ownership of social means of production. By this I mean that the majority apparatus used to produce goods which society exchanges and…
…to be distracting and needlessly hostile. >but you keep insisting in trying again a system that again and again has proven itself to be horrible. Not really; have you heard of Badiou's concept of the Communist Hypothesis? His argument is that Socialism, well, Communism has existed as an Idea for centuries, it is always the force to break down the "present state of things", it is the first element of society, the subversive…
…This is why Communism is an anarchist ideology, in recognition of the very problem you have mentioned. Modern day Communists such as Zizek and Badiou accept this, and Badiou urges us to continue with the Communist Hypothesis[0]. The Soviet model was initially radical, but it was not radical enough to overcome the power structures which were much more entrenched than the founders of the revolution thought. So I still think…
…bourgeois is most developed. It seems to me from the outside as though China has wholly abandoned the Communist cause in a less obvious way than North Korea has. I'm about to start reading Badiou on the "Communist Hypothesis". It is clear the modern Marxists and Communists in general need to develop their praxis, or I am unaware of the modern developments.
……我们应该支持当代马克思主义者（以及非马克思主义的共产主义者）、无政府主义者和公社主义者去研究和探索、推进他们的假说。关于这一点，巴迪欧的《共产主义假说》是一本好书。
…we should support modern day Marxists (and non-Marxian Communists), anarchists and Communalists in their research and investigation into advancing their hypothesis. A good read on this is Badiou's The Communist Hypothesis.
……如果他们是在支持它，他们心中的共产主义可能和你的完全不是一回事？当代共产主义学者就是如此，我们必须去考察共产主义的本体论；关于这点推荐读读巴迪欧的《共产主义假说》。大多数现代学术界共产主义者认为，我们必须探寻到底发生了什么、如何去预防它、以及如何超越它，更不用提共产主义大家庭里林林总总的分支和同侪了……
…that, if they talk in favour of it, they have a different idea of Communism to you? Modern Communist academics do, we must investigate the ontology of Communism; a good read on this is from Badiou, The Communist Hypothesis. Most modern academic Communists believe that we must search for what happened, how to prevent it and how to move past it, to say nothing of the various splinters and brothers in the Communist family…
……共产主义，在学术圈里，共产主义的含义可以被延伸得远超你的预料；巴迪欧写道，“哪里有国家，哪里就有反对它的共产主义”。这就是所谓的“共产主义假说”。再来看资本主义的定义，核心要素是社会生产资料的私有制。我指的是，用来生产社会用于交换的商品的大多数机器设备和……
…Communism, within academia the meaning of Communism can be stretched much father than you may have anticipated; Badiou writes, "where there is a State, there is Communism to oppose it". This is known as the Communist hypothesis. On to the definiton of capitalism, the main factor is the private ownership of social means of production. By this I mean that the majority apparatus used to produce goods which society exchanges and…
……容易转移注意力而且平白带来敌意。>但你还在一再坚持尝试一个屡屡被证明很可怕的制度。并不尽然；你听说过巴迪欧的“共产主义假说”概念吗？他的论点是，社会主义——或者说共产主义——作为一种观念已经存在了几个世纪，它始终是一股打破“现状”的力量，是社会的第一要素，是那种颠覆性的……
…to be distracting and needlessly hostile. >but you keep insisting in trying again a system that again and again has proven itself to be horrible. Not really; have you heard of Badiou's concept of the Communist Hypothesis? His argument is that Socialism, well, Communism has existed as an Idea for centuries, it is always the force to break down the "present state of things", it is the first element of society, the subversive…
……这就是为什么共产主义是一种无政府主义意识形态，它承认了你提到的正是那个核心问题。齐泽克和巴迪欧等当代共产主义者都承认这一点，巴迪欧还敦促我们继续坚持“共产主义假说”[0]。苏联模式起初是激进的，但它还不够激进，没能打破根深蒂固程度远超革命先驱想象的权力结构。所以我依然认为……
…This is why Communism is an anarchist ideology, in recognition of the very problem you have mentioned. Modern day Communists such as Zizek and Badiou accept this, and Badiou urges us to continue with the Communist Hypothesis[0]. The Soviet model was initially radical, but it was not radical enough to overcome the power structures which were much more entrenched than the founders of the revolution thought. So I still think…
……资产阶级最成熟的地方。从外部来看，中国似乎以一种比朝鲜更不明显的方式彻底放弃了共产主义事业。我正打算拜读巴迪欧关于“共产主义假说”的著作。很明显，现代马克思主义者乃至整个共产主义阵营都需要发展他们的 praxis（实践），否则就是我跟不上现代的发展了。
…bourgeois is most developed. It seems to me from the outside as though China has wholly abandoned the Communist cause in a less obvious way than North Korea has. I'm about to start reading Badiou on the "Communist Hypothesis". It is clear the modern Marxists and Communists in general need to develop their praxis, or I am unaware of the modern developments.