科学超市
Science-mart
Philip Mirowski · 初版 2011 年
3人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及
这部见解深刻的研究分析了二战以来美国科学在质量与格局上的兴衰演变。冷战期间，美国政府为科学和医学基础研究提供了充足的资助。然而从20世纪80年代开始，这种支持逐渐减少，营利性企业成为科研的最大资助者。Philip Mirowski 指出，一股强劲的新自由主义意识形态推动了一种截然不同的知识与发现观：科学研究的成果并非人人皆可自由享用的公共品，而是可以被
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
…二期临床试验完成于……中国/印度。多年来，由于当地工作人员和管理层所承受的压力，导致这些研究普遍造假的证据一直在不断增加。想深入了解的话，我推荐 Philip Mirowski 写的《Science Mart: Privatizing American Science》。
…Phase II trials are done...in China/India. The evidence that these studies are largely faked due to the pressure put on the staff and management there has been piling up for years. I would recommend “Science Mart: Privatizing American Science” by Philip Mirowski for more on this.
我鼓励这里的每个人都读读 Mirowski 写的《Science-mart》。它揭示了给科学引入市场机制以及片面追求“效率”所带来的诸多局限性。
I encourage everyone here to read the book Science-mart by Mirowski. It reveals a lot of limitations of adding markets and the search for "efficiency" in science.
Philip Mirowski 写的《Science Mart》写得很透彻，无论是对科研人员还是外行人士，都把导致这种局面的政治经济变革阐述得清清楚楚。
Science Mart by Philip Mirowski does a good job of laying out, for those in research but also for those who are not, the political-economic changes that are responsible for this.
…在上面投入了大量心血。让我再补充一点，看看我说的能不能跟你说的对得上。如果对不上那就是我全搞错了。很多书，比如 Daniel Drezner 写的《The Idea Industry》以及 Philip Mirowski 写的《Science-Mart》，都提到自 60 年代末以来大学预算的削减严重动摇了其稳定性，以至于学者们不得不卷入一场愚蠢而毫无意义的生存之战…
…put a lot of effort into it. Let me add one more point, and see if what I said merges with what you said. If not I'm completely wrong. A lot of books, like The Idea Industry by Daniel Drezner and also Science-Mart by Philip Mirowski say that the cutting of university budgets since the late 60's has led to such an undermining of their stability that Academics have had to engage in a stupid, pointless, survival battle…