纯语言学方面我推荐 Andrew Radford 的《转换语法》（Transformational Grammar）以及 George Lakoff 和 Mark Johnson 合著的《我们赖以生存的隐喻》（Metaphors We Live By）。而在 NLP 方面，Dan Jurafski 和 James H. Martin 的《Speech and Language Processing》非常棒，而且里面有很好的项目……
For pure linguistics I'd recommend Transformational Grammar by Andrew Radford and Metaphors We Live By by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. And for NLP, Dan Jurafski and James H. Martin's Speech and Language Processing is excellent, and there are great projects…
…dad's Neurolinguistic Programming books in a box. Now (the other) NLP gets a lot of mostly-deserved flak for being pseudoscientific, but I understood it then pretty well (it grew out of the same Chomsky Transformational Grammar that informs programming language design, eh) and I can vouch for it's rigour and effectiveness. In a nutshell these folks have discovered the "operating system" of the mind. The problem there is that…
…vol I and II https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/964154.The_Structure_of_... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/821993.The_Structure_of_... Essentially, by modelling therapists' verbal patterns using Transformational Grammar a formal theory of mind was evolved that has lead to sophisticated algorithms for various kinds of psychological change. Unfortunately, a lot of pseudo-science and "woo" has grown up around it, but please…
…arena) and self-help deal with ideas that are really grounded in philosophy proper. Philosophy is the original psychology and the original self-help. FWIW the origins of NLP are grounded in Chomsky's Transformational Grammar. That's not philosophy, of course, but it's something. (Computer language hierarchy stems from the same linguistic modeling.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformational_grammar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy…
…it pseudo-science.) In brief, it started with linguistic analysis of transcripts of videos of therapy session with some very talented and successful therapists. (The analysis was informed by the same Transformational Grammar of Chomsky that also informs formal language design.) It was noticed that some people tend to favor "preferred" sensory systems, and a model of subjective experience was developed that allowed for eliciting…
…original work grew out of linguistic analysis of particularly effective therapists (Satir, Perls, Erikson), they were literally transcribing therapy sessions and started applying ideas from Chomsky's Transformational Grammar. > What resources could you provide on this for a skeptical cognitive scientist? First of all, I'm sorry to say that most of the stuff on the Internet about (the other) NLP seems to be fluffy and nonscientific…
纯语言学方面我推荐 Andrew Radford 的《转换语法》（Transformational Grammar）以及 George Lakoff 和 Mark Johnson 合著的《我们赖以生存的隐喻》（Metaphors We Live By）。而在 NLP 方面，Dan Jurafski 和 James H. Martin 的《Speech and Language Processing》非常棒，而且里面有很好的项目……
For pure linguistics I'd recommend Transformational Grammar by Andrew Radford and Metaphors We Live By by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. And for NLP, Dan Jurafski and James H. Martin's Speech and Language Processing is excellent, and there are great projects…
……一盒子里放着我爸的神经语言规划（NLP）书籍。现在（另一个）NLP 因为伪科学性质招来了很多基本上是罪有应得的非议，但我当时理解得还算挺透彻的（它脱胎于 Chomsky 的转换语法，正是同一种理论启发了编程语言的设计，对吧），我可以为它的严谨性和有效性打包票。简而言之，这帮人发现了心智的“操作系统”。问题在于……
…dad's Neurolinguistic Programming books in a box. Now (the other) NLP gets a lot of mostly-deserved flak for being pseudoscientific, but I understood it then pretty well (it grew out of the same Chomsky Transformational Grammar that informs programming language design, eh) and I can vouch for it's rigour and effectiveness. In a nutshell these folks have discovered the "operating system" of the mind. The problem there is that…
……第一卷和第二卷 https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/964154.The_Structure_of_... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/821993.The_Structure_of_... 从本质上讲，通过使用转换语法对治疗师的语言模式进行建模，形成了一套形式化的心智理论，并由此发展出针对各种心理改变的复杂算法。不幸的是，围绕它滋生了大量的伪科学和“玄学忽悠”，但请……
…vol I and II https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/964154.The_Structure_of_... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/821993.The_Structure_of_... Essentially, by modelling therapists' verbal patterns using Transformational Grammar a formal theory of mind was evolved that has lead to sophisticated algorithms for various kinds of psychological change. Unfortunately, a lot of pseudo-science and "woo" has grown up around it, but please…
……领域）和自助类书籍探讨的理念，其实都深深扎根于正统哲学。哲学才是最初的心理学，也是最初的个人成长与自助。顺便说一句（FWIW），NLP 的渊源正是 Chomsky 的转换语法。这当然不是哲学，但也有点意思。（计算机语言的层次结构同样源于这种语言学建模。）https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformational_grammar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy……
…arena) and self-help deal with ideas that are really grounded in philosophy proper. Philosophy is the original psychology and the original self-help. FWIW the origins of NLP are grounded in Chomsky's Transformational Grammar. That's not philosophy, of course, but it's something. (Computer language hierarchy stems from the same linguistic modeling.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformational_grammar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy…
……称之为伪科学。）简而言之，它始于对一些非常优秀且成功的治疗师的治疗过程录像逐字稿进行的语言学分析。（这种分析借鉴了 Chomsky 的转换语法，而该语法同时也启发了形式语言设计。）人们注意到，有些人往往偏好某种“优势”感官系统，于是开发出了一种主观经验模型，可以用来诱发……
…it pseudo-science.) In brief, it started with linguistic analysis of transcripts of videos of therapy session with some very talented and successful therapists. (The analysis was informed by the same Transformational Grammar of Chomsky that also informs formal language design.) It was noticed that some people tend to favor "preferred" sensory systems, and a model of subjective experience was developed that allowed for eliciting…
……最初的研究源于对一些特别出色的心理治疗师（Satir、Perls、Erikson）的语言学分析，他们当时逐字逐句转录治疗过程，并开始应用 Chomsky 转换语法的概念。> 对于持怀疑态度的认知科学家，你能提供什么相关的资源吗？首先，很遗憾，网上关于（另一个）NLP 的绝大部分内容似乎都很浮躁且不科学……
…original work grew out of linguistic analysis of particularly effective therapists (Satir, Perls, Erikson), they were literally transcribing therapy sessions and started applying ideas from Chomsky's Transformational Grammar. > What resources could you provide on this for a skeptical cognitive scientist? First of all, I'm sorry to say that most of the stuff on the Internet about (the other) NLP seems to be fluffy and nonscientific…