道德风景
The Moral Landscape
Sam Harris · 初版 2010 年
17人推荐
33位读者提及
37次提及
为什么值得读
- 以世俗视角探讨不依赖宗教教义的道德基础
- 主张人类幸福与生存议题并非处于科学认知之外
- 论证道德探讨不应流于虚无的直觉或主观武断
在任何给定情境下，你能做出的最佳“道德”决定是什么？你的生理机能有诸多方面在协同运作，以便利用认知过程做出清醒的抉择。无论是以往还是近期，都有大量科学研究不仅在探讨道德及其对人们的意义，还在探究大脑各个区域内部正在发生的变化。本书作者 Sam Harris 试图论证，作为人类，我们应该尝试以一种能帮助我们做出更好道德决定的方式来利用科学，而……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
> 作为反方观点，我想问问无宗教信仰的人，> 究竟是什么让一个行为成为善行？你可能会有兴趣读读 Sam Harris 的《道德景观》（The Moral Landscape），它为深入解答这个问题提供了一个很好的起点。这是对道德的一种世俗视角审视，探讨了我们如何在没有不科学观念（比如存在……
> As a counter-point let me ask a non-religious person, > what makes an act good? You might be interested in reading The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris for an in-depth start at an answer to that question. It's a secular look at morality and how we can reason about morality without a foundation of unscientific ideas (e.g. the existence…
Sam Harris 的《道德景观：科学如何决定人类价值》（The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values）是一本新书，归入哲学、人类行为评论类别，而且免不了会引用 Bertrand Russell。Harris 这位……
"The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values" by Sam Harris is a new release which falls into the category of philosophy, remarks on human behavior, and is bound to reference Bertrand Russell. Harris, who…
要是你还没读过的话，真该看看 Sam Harris 的《道德景观：科学如何决定人类价值》（The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values）。他令人信服地（至少对我来说）论证了道德讨论不一定非得是武断的，或者由“直觉”主导。相反，他提出……
You should read Sam Harris's "The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values" if you haven't already. He writes convincingly (for me anyway) that moral discussions need not be arbitrary or driven by "gut instinct." Instead he proposes…
……杀人、剥夺人的自由等等，都会损害人类的幸福感和生存能力。如果你有兴趣更深入地探讨这个话题，我强烈推荐读读 Sam Harris 的书《道德景观：科学如何决定人类价值》（The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values）：http://www.amazon.com/Moral-Landscape-Science-Determine-Valu...
…Killing people, depriving them of freedom, etc. all strain humans' happiness and survivability. If you are interested in exploring this in greater detail, I highly recommend giving Sam Harris' book, _The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values_, a read: http://www.amazon.com/Moral-Landscape-Science-Determine-Valu...
……认真对待；或者至少承认它们并没有超出科学或科学思维的范畴。Sam Harris 在《道德景观》（The Moral Landscape）一书中特别探讨了道德为何没有超出科学领域，那是一本极好的书。
…seriously; or at least acknowledge that they are not outside the bounds of science, or of scientific thinking. Sam Harris discusses in particular how morality is not beyond the realm of science in "The Moral Landscape," which is a great book.
……我不确定，我不知道你所谓的“我的论点”指的是什么。也许你可以把前因后果稍微补充完整一点；我没明白你的意思。（你对我一无所知。我是 Sam Harris 的《道德景观》（The Moral Landscape）的铁杆粉丝。我这么说是因为根据你对我“观点”/论点的描述，你直接把我和它打到了对立阵营。）归根结底，那个词的作用真是耐人寻味。（我也说不太准）夹在……
…I'm not sure, I don't know what you are calling 'my argument'. Maybe if you filled in the dots here a bit; I don't know what you mean. (You know nothing about me. I'm a huge fan of Sam Harris' book The Moral Landscape. I say that because going by what you're saying about my 'view'/argument, you've put me in the opposite camp to that.) Ultimately, It's fascinating what that word's doing. (I'm not sure exactly) Sandwiched…