笛卡尔的《指导心智的规则》（Regulae，即 Rules for the Direction of the Mind）。网上能找到电子版，但我找到的全都是残篇。最好的版本收录在 John Cottingham 的《The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1》里 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
Descartes' Regulae (Rules for the Direction of the Mind). There are online copies, but all the ones I have found are incomplete. The best one is in John Cottingham's The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
…它们。Mary Oliver 的《The Rules for the Dance》。我以前就知道自己喜欢某些类型的诗歌，但从未真正明白为什么。这本书拆解了格律诗并解释了其运作机制。笛卡尔的《指导心智的规则》（The Rules for the Direction of the Mind），又称 regulae。
…them. The Rules for the Dance by Mary Oliver. I already knew I liked certain kinds of poetry, but never really understood why. This book breaks down metrical poetry and explains how it works. The Rules for the Direction of the Mind by Descartes, aka the regulae.
笛卡尔简明扼要的《指导心智的规则》（rules for the direction of the mind）[1] 在这里很贴切，因为它极妙地阐释了何为“思考”，以及思考与“记忆”的关系。在我们的很多思考中，概念必须被“内化”为直觉，而如果…
Descartes' brief rules for the direction of the mind [1] is pertinent here, as it articulates beautifully what it means to do "thinking" and how that relates to "memory". Concepts have to be "internalized" into intuition for much of our thinking, and if…
我觉得有些内容其实就在那儿，只是被埋没了。比如，我最先想到的就是笛卡尔以及他的《指导心智的规则》（Rules for the Direction of the Mind），于是我查了一下：它确实在列表里 [1]，但似乎完全没有任何相关讨论，而且那个页面也是唯一提到笛卡尔的地方。[1] 参见此页面：http://www.ludism.org/mentat/BrainBooks
I think some of that stuff is there, it's just buried. For instance, the first thing I thought of was Descartes, and his Rules for the Direction of the Mind, so I checked: it is listed [1], but there seems to be no discussion of it, and that page is the only mention of Descartes. [1] on this page: http://www.ludism.org/mentat/BrainBooks
…大前提）重点不在于基础知识“是什么”——而在于每个人“如何”从第一性原理出发去“拆解剖析”这些基础知识。笛卡尔在《指导心智的规则》（Rules for the direction of the mind）中就阐述过这一点，可惜这本书至今鲜有人读，已被世人遗忘。这两种方法的区别在于，作者的方法并没有清晰界定何为“学习”。事实上，它甚至可能助长…
…the broad premise) it is not what the foundational knowledge "is" - but "how" the foundational knowledge is "unpacked" by each person from the first principles. this was articulated by Descartes in "Rules for the direction of the mind" which remains sadly unread and forgotten. the difference between the 2 approaches is that the author's approach does not clearly delineate what is meant by "learning". In fact, it could even encourage…
笛卡尔的《指导心智的规则》（Regulae，即 Rules for the Direction of the Mind）。网上能找到电子版，但我找到的全都是残篇。最好的版本收录在 John Cottingham 的《The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1》里 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
Descartes' Regulae (Rules for the Direction of the Mind). There are online copies, but all the ones I have found are incomplete. The best one is in John Cottingham's The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the...
…它们。Mary Oliver 的《The Rules for the Dance》。我以前就知道自己喜欢某些类型的诗歌，但从未真正明白为什么。这本书拆解了格律诗并解释了其运作机制。笛卡尔的《指导心智的规则》（The Rules for the Direction of the Mind），又称 regulae。
…them. The Rules for the Dance by Mary Oliver. I already knew I liked certain kinds of poetry, but never really understood why. This book breaks down metrical poetry and explains how it works. The Rules for the Direction of the Mind by Descartes, aka the regulae.
笛卡尔简明扼要的《指导心智的规则》（rules for the direction of the mind）[1] 在这里很贴切，因为它极妙地阐释了何为“思考”，以及思考与“记忆”的关系。在我们的很多思考中，概念必须被“内化”为直觉，而如果…
Descartes' brief rules for the direction of the mind [1] is pertinent here, as it articulates beautifully what it means to do "thinking" and how that relates to "memory". Concepts have to be "internalized" into intuition for much of our thinking, and if…
我觉得有些内容其实就在那儿，只是被埋没了。比如，我最先想到的就是笛卡尔以及他的《指导心智的规则》（Rules for the Direction of the Mind），于是我查了一下：它确实在列表里 [1]，但似乎完全没有任何相关讨论，而且那个页面也是唯一提到笛卡尔的地方。[1] 参见此页面：http://www.ludism.org/mentat/BrainBooks
I think some of that stuff is there, it's just buried. For instance, the first thing I thought of was Descartes, and his Rules for the Direction of the Mind, so I checked: it is listed [1], but there seems to be no discussion of it, and that page is the only mention of Descartes. [1] on this page: http://www.ludism.org/mentat/BrainBooks
…大前提）重点不在于基础知识“是什么”——而在于每个人“如何”从第一性原理出发去“拆解剖析”这些基础知识。笛卡尔在《指导心智的规则》（Rules for the direction of the mind）中就阐述过这一点，可惜这本书至今鲜有人读，已被世人遗忘。这两种方法的区别在于，作者的方法并没有清晰界定何为“学习”。事实上，它甚至可能助长…
…the broad premise) it is not what the foundational knowledge "is" - but "how" the foundational knowledge is "unpacked" by each person from the first principles. this was articulated by Descartes in "Rules for the direction of the mind" which remains sadly unread and forgotten. the difference between the 2 approaches is that the author's approach does not clearly delineate what is meant by "learning". In fact, it could even encourage…