……神话在启蒙运动中的卷入，以及启蒙运动无意识地企图用伪装成科学的思维来取代神话形式，我会推荐霍克海默和阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》（The Dialectic of Enlightenment）[0]。[0] 这本书直到1965年才再版。阅读前的摘要可以看这里：https://frankfurtschool.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/summary-dia...
…involvement of myth in the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment's unconscious project to simply replace the form of myth with thinking disguised as scientific, I'd recommend Horkheimer and Adorno's The Dialectic of Enlightenment[0]. [0] The book was re-published as late as 1965. Here's a summary before you read: https://frankfurtschool.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/summary-dia...
…programs put out by different stations. No mechanism of reply has been developed, and private transmissions are condemned to unfreedom. (from "The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception" in Dialectic of Enlightenment by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno) I think this passage is brilliantly relevant to these discussions. For me the internet provides an illusion of interactivity when really most if not all of it…
《拟像与仿真》（Simulacra and Simulation）- 让·鲍德里亚 《启蒙辩证法》（Dialectic of Enlightenment）- 马克斯·霍克海默、西奥多·阿多诺 《意识形态的崇高客体》（The Sublime Object of Ideology）- 斯拉沃热·齐泽克 《自我的根源》（Sources of the Self）- 查尔斯·泰勒
Simulacra and Simulation - Jean Baudrillard Dialectic of Enlightenment - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno The Sublime Object of Ideology - Slavoj Zizek Sources of the Self - Charles Taylor
…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wfNl2L0Gf8 There is a plethora of writings of substance in the continental tradition. Writings that we should not ignore. 'Discipline and Punish' is one of them. I recommend 'The Dialectic of Enlightenment' by Adorno as your complement to Popper's writings. On another note, I don't generally see the value in antagonisms between paradigms or presentation forms. I find value from the analytical perspective…
> 一开始硬着头皮读些无聊的东西，说不定会有意想不到的收获，这是我当年啃黑格尔辩证法时的亲身体会 :D 不错。如果你喜欢那个，不妨看看阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》（Dialectic of Enlightenment）和/或《否定的辩证法》（Negative Dialectics）。
> Reading through something boring at first may give interesting results, learned it first hand studying Hegels dialectics :D Nice. If you enjoyed that, you may want to check out Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment and/or Negative Dialectics.
……神话在启蒙运动中的卷入，以及启蒙运动无意识地企图用伪装成科学的思维来取代神话形式，我会推荐霍克海默和阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》（The Dialectic of Enlightenment）[0]。[0] 这本书直到1965年才再版。阅读前的摘要可以看这里：https://frankfurtschool.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/summary-dia...
…involvement of myth in the Enlightenment and the Enlightenment's unconscious project to simply replace the form of myth with thinking disguised as scientific, I'd recommend Horkheimer and Adorno's The Dialectic of Enlightenment[0]. [0] The book was re-published as late as 1965. Here's a summary before you read: https://frankfurtschool.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/summary-dia...
……不同电台播出的节目。没有任何回应机制被开发出来，私人的传播被剥夺了自由。（摘自马克斯·霍克海默与特奥多·W·阿多诺《启蒙辩证法》中的《文化工业：作为大众欺骗的启蒙》）。我认为这段话跟眼下的讨论简直太契合了。对我而言，互联网提供了一种交互的错觉，而实际上大部分甚至所有……
…programs put out by different stations. No mechanism of reply has been developed, and private transmissions are condemned to unfreedom. (from "The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception" in Dialectic of Enlightenment by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno) I think this passage is brilliantly relevant to these discussions. For me the internet provides an illusion of interactivity when really most if not all of it…
《拟像与仿真》（Simulacra and Simulation）- 让·鲍德里亚 《启蒙辩证法》（Dialectic of Enlightenment）- 马克斯·霍克海默、西奥多·阿多诺 《意识形态的崇高客体》（The Sublime Object of Ideology）- 斯拉沃热·齐泽克 《自我的根源》（Sources of the Self）- 查尔斯·泰勒
Simulacra and Simulation - Jean Baudrillard Dialectic of Enlightenment - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno The Sublime Object of Ideology - Slavoj Zizek Sources of the Self - Charles Taylor
……https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wfNl2L0Gf8 欧陆传统中有大量非常有分量的著作。这些著作我们不应该忽视。《规训与惩罚》就是其中之一。我推荐阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》作为你对波普尔著作的补充。顺便提一句，我通常不觉得范式或表达形式之间的对立有什么价值。我倾向于从分析的视角中发现价值……
…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wfNl2L0Gf8 There is a plethora of writings of substance in the continental tradition. Writings that we should not ignore. 'Discipline and Punish' is one of them. I recommend 'The Dialectic of Enlightenment' by Adorno as your complement to Popper's writings. On another note, I don't generally see the value in antagonisms between paradigms or presentation forms. I find value from the analytical perspective…
> 一开始硬着头皮读些无聊的东西，说不定会有意想不到的收获，这是我当年啃黑格尔辩证法时的亲身体会 :D 不错。如果你喜欢那个，不妨看看阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》（Dialectic of Enlightenment）和/或《否定的辩证法》（Negative Dialectics）。
> Reading through something boring at first may give interesting results, learned it first hand studying Hegels dialectics :D Nice. If you enjoyed that, you may want to check out Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment and/or Negative Dialectics.
你应该读读这本叫《启蒙辩证法》（Dialectic of Enlightenment）的有趣书[0] [0]https://monoskop.org/images/2/27/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theod...
you should read this fun book called the Dialectic of Enlightenment[0] [0]https://monoskop.org/images/2/27/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theod...