物理学
Physics
Aristotle · 初版 -350 年
5人推荐
18位读者提及
19次提及
为什么值得读
- 直面哲学中最深刻厚重的问题
- 理论构建扎实，超越传统经院说教
- 可与罗威利等现代学者的导读互参
Aristotle（公元前 384–322 年）准备出版的著作几乎全部失传；现存的无价文献均为讲义材料、笔记和备忘录（其中部分为伪作）。它们可分为实践类、逻辑类、物理学类、形而上学类、艺术论著、其他以及残篇。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Physics
Aristotle · 初版 -350 年
Aristotle（公元前 384–322 年）准备出版的著作几乎全部失传；现存的无价文献均为讲义材料、笔记和备忘录（其中部分为伪作）。它们可分为实践类、逻辑类、物理学类、形而上学类、艺术论著、其他以及残篇。
正在加载完整评论……
……在谈论什么。他当然是对的，但要想行之有效，必须有理论和更好的实验支撑，而这正是伽利略所提供的。推荐 Carlo Rovelli 关于亚里士多德《物理学》的短文：https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4057.pdf。
…talking about. Of course he was right but for this to be effective there needs to be a theory and better experiments and that is what Galileo provided. I recommend Carlo Rovelli's essay on Aristotle's Physics: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4057.pdf.
亚里士多德的《物理学》、《形而上学》和《论灵魂》（De Anima）。
Aristotle's Physics, Metaphysics, and De Anima.
两点建议。首先，我可能会建议先读《形而上学》，再读《物理学》。其次，我觉得作为新手一个人硬啃亚里士多德原著可能不是最好的选择。最好还是先从导读或更适合教学入门的材料开始……
Two points. First, I might recommend the Metaphysics before the Physics. Second, I think reading the original Aristotle as a novice and alone is perhaps not the best move. I think it is best to start with a commentary or something more pedagogically suitable.…
你可能对这篇感兴趣：“亚里士多德的《物理学》：一位物理学家的视角”。我的看法是，当时很难找到更好的理论，通常归咎于经院哲学教条主义的解释未免太肤浅了。https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4057
You may be interested in: "Aristotle's Physics: a Physicist's Look" My take is that it was hard to find a better theory, the usual explanation of scholastical dogmatism is to shallow. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4057
……这两部文本。再给你加点料勾勾胃口，维特根斯坦晚年对《泰阿泰德篇》特别着迷。如果一定要我推荐亚里士多德的两部作品，那绝对是他的《物理学》和《形而上学》。在这里，他探讨的是哲学中真正深刻、干货满满的硬核问题。可以说，这四部文本绝对让我欲罢不能，虽说我一聊起它们我老婆就觉得无聊透顶……
…these two texts. As an added incentive to whet your appetite, Wittgenstein was particularly interested in Theaetetus in his later years. And if I had to recommend two texts from Aristotle, definitely his Physics and his Metaphysics. Here he's dealing with the really deep, and meaty, problems of philosophy. These four texts definitely get me going, so to speak, although my talking about them bores my wife silly.…
> 我觉得这个词的现代用法可以追溯到亚里士多德的著作：《物理学》与《形而上学》。《物理学》研究的是自然，感觉像是现代科学的直系祖先。《形而上学》则跟我们今天所谓的形而上学非常接近。大多数人认为这些东西（逻辑，……
> I think modern usage of the term dates to Aristotle's books: Physics & Metaphysics. 'Physics' is about nature and feels like a direct ancestor to modern science. 'Metaphysics' is pretty close to what we still call metaphysics. Most people think of these things (logic,…