
玻璃蜂
The Glass Bees
Ernst Jünger · 初版 2000 年
2人推荐
4位读者提及
6次提及
在《The Glass Bees》中,德国著名作家Ernst junger描绘了一个令人不安的未来景象。才华横溢的商人Zapparoni凭借对先进技术的深刻理解以及对信息和娱乐业的战略掌控,形成了一种隐蔽的全球统治模式。但Zapparoni担心他所依赖的科学家可能会出卖他的机密。他需要一名安保主管,而退伍老兵兼战争英雄Richard正是胜任该职位的人选。然而,当他抵达作为Zapparoni总部的优美乡村庄园时,却发现自己身处……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
我挺喜欢 Junger 的。《The Glass Bees》(玻璃蜜蜂)是一部非常耐人寻味的科技寓言。它对现代科技行业的某些预测相当精准。文章里的绝大多数冷嘲热讽都很低级。我很喜欢 Jean Cocteau 谈到……的这句引用:
I quite like Junger. The Glass Bees is a really interesting parable about technology. It predicts parts of the modern tech industry quite accurately. Most of the potshots in the article are cheap. I like this quote from Jean Cocteau about…
简直就是直接取材自 Ernst Junger 最棒的那本书:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Glass_Bees(1957 年)
Right out of Ernst Junger's best book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Glass_Bees (1957)
《The Glass Bees》很适合在 AI 领域工作的人读读。相比之下,《The Rain of Steel》(钢铁风暴)就纯粹是战斗,直到停战协定砸在士兵头上为止。
The Glass Bees might be suitable reading for anyone working in AI. The Rain of Steel, on the other hand - it's just combat until the Armistice drops on the soldiers.
我目前正在读《The Glass Bees》,这是 Ernst Junger 在 1957 年写的一部科幻小说。讲的是一名走投无路的退伍骑兵去一家科技巨头那里参加一场疑点重重的面试。整本书算是对时代变迁的一场长篇沉思……
I am currently reading "The Glass Bees", Ernst Junger's scifi novel from 1957. It's about a former cavalryman fallen on hard times who goes for a shady job interview with a technology mogul. Its kind of an extended meditation on changing times…
……思想更偏保守的人也会感到失望。别想读到 Ernst Jünger!没错,你能买到《钢铁风暴》,那本太出名了封禁不了,但《冒险的心》或(非常切中当下时弊的)《玻璃蜜蜂》就别想了。天知道他们要是读了《大理石悬崖》会怎样!反倒是非二元性别的东西堆了一层又一层,而房租依旧贵得离谱。
…more conservative bent will be disappointed, too. No Ernst Jünger for you! Yes, you can get the Rain of Steel, it's too well known to be suppressed, but not the Adventurous Heart or the (very topical) Glass Bees. And heaven forfend you read the Marble Cliffs! But genderqueer stuff on top of genderqueer stuff, and the rent is still too high.
认为《The Glass Bees》是本“鲜为人知”的书……这就挺离奇了。它可是由纽约书评(New York Review Books)重印出版的,那可绝不是什么无人知晓的小作坊出版社。
The idea that The Glass Bees is "little-known" is ... curious. It was republished by New York Review Books, not exactly a small little press no one's ever heard of.