事实上，这相当相关。诗《If》在很大程度上是对传统男性气质的背书，而同一类极右保守主义正是《白人的负担》（The White Man's Burden）——以及他另一部名作《丛林之书》——中种族主义偏见的根源。事实上，《If》这首诗与殖民主义的联系甚至更直接：> 举一个例子，Rudyard Kipling 的诗《If……》（1895），它起到了……
This is, in fact, quite relevant. The poem "If" is, largely, an endorsement of traditional norms of masculinity, and the same sort of far-right conservatism is the source of the racist prejudices in The White Man's Burden--and in his other famous work, The Jungle Book. In fact, the connection between the poem "If" and colonialism is even more direct: > To take one example, Rudyard Kipling’s poem ‘If…’ (1895), which acts…
……福祉取决于他们的作为和不作为。他们和白人（或黑人）民族主义者一样以种族为中心，只是立场不同。他们都可以把吉卜林的《The White Man's Burden》当作指南，只是他们将其视为对“白人”的控诉，而非昭昭天命的宣言。他们否认“非白人”的能动性，声称这些人只有真正达到他们的……
…well-being depends on their actions and inactions. They are just as race-centred as white (or black) nationalists, they just approach the situation from a different position. They can both use Kipling's The White Man's Burden as a guide, they just view it as an indictment against 'the white man' instead of a proclamation of manifest destiny. They deny agency to 'non-white' people by claiming they can only truly reach their…
……对某种心态很有吸引力，这种想法家长式作风且容易被滥用，这一点应该不言自明。这是吉卜林那篇（深度种族主义和殖民主义的）《The White Man's Burden》的进步主义翻版，只不过这里被劝诱去给蒙昧无知者带来启蒙的是进步主义者。但我们再进一步，假设它 somehow 是合理的，我们仍然会面临……
…seductive to a certain type of mindset, the paternalistic and ripe for abuse nature of this idea should be self-evident. It is the progressive equivalent of Kipling's (deeply racist and colonialist) "The White Man's Burden", only here the it is the progressive who are being exhorted to bring enlightenment to the benighted ignorant. But let's go further and suppose that it were justified somehow, we'd still be faced with…
……不喜欢他们。我们就是这样学习和成长的（而且现代的小孩实际上会理解或混淆它们吗）。但回答你的问题，我猜是因为鲁德亚德·吉卜林写了《The White Man's Burden》（1899）。这让人暴跳如雷，尽管任何有点历史知识的人都会意识到，一战后日本人对密克罗尼西亚实施了更严格的这种哲学解释（显然……
…don't like them. It's how we learn and grow (also like a kid would actually understand or conflate them in this modern time). But to answer your question, I assume it's because Rudyard Kipling wrote "The White Man's Burden" (1899). It drives people apoplectic, although anyone with any history knowledge would realize that post wwI the Japanese applied an even stricter interpretation of this philosophy to Micronesia (obviously…
事实上，这相当相关。诗《If》在很大程度上是对传统男性气质的背书，而同一类极右保守主义正是《白人的负担》（The White Man's Burden）——以及他另一部名作《丛林之书》——中种族主义偏见的根源。事实上，《If》这首诗与殖民主义的联系甚至更直接：> 举一个例子，Rudyard Kipling 的诗《If……》（1895），它起到了……
This is, in fact, quite relevant. The poem "If" is, largely, an endorsement of traditional norms of masculinity, and the same sort of far-right conservatism is the source of the racist prejudices in The White Man's Burden--and in his other famous work, The Jungle Book. In fact, the connection between the poem "If" and colonialism is even more direct: > To take one example, Rudyard Kipling’s poem ‘If…’ (1895), which acts…
……福祉取决于他们的作为和不作为。他们和白人（或黑人）民族主义者一样以种族为中心，只是立场不同。他们都可以把吉卜林的《The White Man's Burden》当作指南，只是他们将其视为对“白人”的控诉，而非昭昭天命的宣言。他们否认“非白人”的能动性，声称这些人只有真正达到他们的……
…well-being depends on their actions and inactions. They are just as race-centred as white (or black) nationalists, they just approach the situation from a different position. They can both use Kipling's The White Man's Burden as a guide, they just view it as an indictment against 'the white man' instead of a proclamation of manifest destiny. They deny agency to 'non-white' people by claiming they can only truly reach their…
……对某种心态很有吸引力，这种想法家长式作风且容易被滥用，这一点应该不言自明。这是吉卜林那篇（深度种族主义和殖民主义的）《The White Man's Burden》的进步主义翻版，只不过这里被劝诱去给蒙昧无知者带来启蒙的是进步主义者。但我们再进一步，假设它 somehow 是合理的，我们仍然会面临……
…seductive to a certain type of mindset, the paternalistic and ripe for abuse nature of this idea should be self-evident. It is the progressive equivalent of Kipling's (deeply racist and colonialist) "The White Man's Burden", only here the it is the progressive who are being exhorted to bring enlightenment to the benighted ignorant. But let's go further and suppose that it were justified somehow, we'd still be faced with…
……不喜欢他们。我们就是这样学习和成长的（而且现代的小孩实际上会理解或混淆它们吗）。但回答你的问题，我猜是因为鲁德亚德·吉卜林写了《The White Man's Burden》（1899）。这让人暴跳如雷，尽管任何有点历史知识的人都会意识到，一战后日本人对密克罗尼西亚实施了更严格的这种哲学解释（显然……
…don't like them. It's how we learn and grow (also like a kid would actually understand or conflate them in this modern time). But to answer your question, I assume it's because Rudyard Kipling wrote "The White Man's Burden" (1899). It drives people apoplectic, although anyone with any history knowledge would realize that post wwI the Japanese applied an even stricter interpretation of this philosophy to Micronesia (obviously…