傲慢与偏见与僵尸
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
Seth Grahame-Smith、Jane Austen、Katherine Kellgren · 初版 2009 年
18位读者提及
19次提及
为什么值得读
- 基于公版原著进行脑洞大开的情节改造
- 设定听起来荒诞搞笑且具有话题度
“凡是拥有脑子的僵尸，一定迫切需要更多的脑子，这已是一条举世公认的真理。”Pride and Prejudice and Zombies 便由此展开，它是对 Jane Austen 备受喜爱的原著小说的扩充版，增添了令人毛骨悚然的全新僵尸大屠杀场景。故事开篇，一场神秘瘟疫降临在宁静的英国乡村 Meryton——死者正纷纷复活！性格刚烈的女主角 Elizabeth Bennet 誓要铲除僵尸威胁，但傲慢自大的 Mr. Darcy 的到来很快分散了她的注意力。随之而来的是一部令人捧腹的风俗喜剧
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……用英语写的，但整场争论都很荒谬。这是艺术。让艺术家去搞艺术吧。喜欢的人自然会喜欢，不喜欢的也不会强求。我并不指望每个简·奥斯汀的粉丝都会喜欢《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》（Pride and Prejudice and Zombies），或者让多丽丝·肯斯·古德温去欣赏《吸血鬼猎人林肯》（其实我敢打赌她挺喜欢的），但那又怎样？原作素材属于 public domain（公有领域），尽情享受公共资源的魅力不香吗。
…written in English, but this whole debate is absurd. It's art. Let artists create art. People who will enjoy it will enjoy it, those who won't won't. I don't expect every Jane Austen fan to enjoy "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies" or Doris Kearns Goodwin to appreciate "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" (actually, I bet she loves it), but so what? The source material is public domain, so let's enjoy the beauty of the commons.
……完全没必要，而且极端情况下明显有害。想想看，要是莎士比亚的剧作至今还受保护，会有多少伟大的电影根本拍不出来。在一个版权期限无限的世界里，你是看不到《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》的。(http://www.amazon.com/dp/1594743347/ref=asc_df_1594743347184...) 顺便说一句：我觉得电影、电视剧和电子游戏的版权期定为 5 年完全是合情合理的，……
…it's not necessary and at the extremes it's clearly harmful. Just think of how many great movies would not have been produced if if Shakespeare's plays where still under protected. You don't get to see Pride and Prejudice and Zombies in a world of unlimited copy-write. (http://www.amazon.com/dp/1594743347/ref=asc_df_1594743347184...) PS: I think a 5 year copy-write length for movies, TV shows and video games is a perfectly acceptable,…
《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》（Pride and Prejudice and Zombies）确实挺有意思，我也很高兴有人享受想出这个点子，也有人喜欢看它的书或电影，但如果它取代了《傲慢与偏见》，那这个世界可就变得更糟了。
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is certainly entertaining, and I’m happy that some people enjoyed coming up with it and others enjoyed watching or reading it, but if it replaced Pride and Prejudice, the world would be worse off.
像《傲慢与偏见与僵尸，作者：简·奥斯汀、赛斯·葛雷恩·史密斯》（Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, by Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith）这种形式大概就够了。
Something like, "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, by Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith" is probably sufficient.
流行作品经常会去挖掘过去处于 public domain（公有领域）的素材。迪士尼动画电影像《灰姑娘》就是这么干的。塞斯·葛雷恩·史密斯写《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》也是如此，诸如此类。这正是版权过期的好处所在——其他人可以利用并改编已发表的作品。
Popular works regularly mine the (public domain) past. Disney animated movies like Cinderella did so. Seth Grahame-Smith did so with Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. and so on. That is literally the benefit of copyright expiration, that other people can utilize and transform a published work.
> 《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》（Pride and Prejudice and Zombies）我买了这本。它的构思执行得妙趣横生，让我不得不佩服。然而它又有点让人发怵，以至于我看了几章就看不下去了。就像那些设定……
> Pride and Prejudice and Zombies I own this. It is so delightfully well executed that I cannot help but be impressed. And yet it is somewhat appalling in that I cannot bring myself to read more than a few chapters. Just as the settings…