脑的阅读
Reading in the Brain
Stanislas Dehaene · 初版 2009 年
2人推荐
5位读者提及
17次提及
一位著名认知神经科学家关于大脑如何习得阅读能力的迷人且信息量极大的记述。白纸上的几个黑色印记如何能唤起声音与意义的整个宇宙？在这项引人入胜的调查研究中，Stanislas Dehaene 通俗易懂地阐述了阅读的大脑回路，并探讨了他所谓的“阅读悖论”（reading paradox）：我们的大脑皮层是在一个没有文字的世界中历经数百万年演化的产物，那么它又是如何适应并识别文字的呢？Reading in the Brain 描述了关于我们如何处理语言的开创性研究，揭示了其中隐藏的逻……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……Fantasy[1]，或是已故学者 John DeFrancis 写的《Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems》[2]，再或者是 J. Marshall Unger 的《Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning》[3]。Stanislas Dehaene 写的《Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention》[4]是一本关于广义阅读的极佳读物，且具备很好的跨文化视角。我在这里举个例子说明中文……
…Fantasy[1] or Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems[2] by the late John DeFrancis or the book Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning[3] by J. Marshall Unger. The book Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention[4] by Stanislas Dehaene is a very good book about reading in general, and has a good cross-cultural perspective. I'll give an example here of how Chinese…
……是针对阅读障碍人群的，但他们终究还是要面对一个满是标准字体的现实世界。关于阅读障碍的诸多顶尖研究，都收录在 Stanislas Dehaene 最近出版的一本非常有趣的书里：《Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read》http://readinginthebrain.pagesperso-orange.fr/intro.htm http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Brain-The-Science-Read/dp/0143...。教育方面确实存在……
…are for people with reading difficulties, who after all are still going to be in a world full of standard fonts. Much of the best research on dyslexia is gathered into the very interesting recent book Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read http://readinginthebrain.pagesperso-orange.fr/intro.htm http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Brain-The-Science-Read/dp/0143... by Stanislas Dehaene. There are definitely educational…
有意思。Stanislas Dehaene 在《Reading in the Brain》[1]这本书中（我强烈推荐，读起来很过瘾），就根据阅读研究从理论层面预测过类似的技术。多年来，每分钟 500 词（大概相当于每分钟一页印刷页）一直是我阅读大部分材料的基准速度……
That's interesting. A technology like this was predicted, on theoretical grounds from reading research, in the book Reading in the Brain[1] by Stanislas Dehaene (which I highly recommend as a very good read). For years 500 words per minute (approximately one printed page per minute) has been my baseline speed for most of the material…
……Fantasy[1]，或是已故学者 John DeFrancis 写的《Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems》[2]，再或者是 J. Marshall Unger 的《Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning》[3]。Stanislas Dehaene 写的《Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention》[4]是一本关于广义阅读的极佳读物，且具备很好的跨文化视角。许多其他词汇、短语的例子……
…Fantasy[1] or Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems[2] by the late John DeFrancis or the book Ideogram: Chinese Characters and the Myth of Disembodied Meaning[3] by J. Marshall Unger. The book Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention[4] by Stanislas Dehaene is a very good book about reading in general, and has a good cross-cultural perspective. Many other examples of words, phrases,…
……相关人群样本量依然极其不足，根本支撑不了那样的结论。附言：关于阅读能力的神经学基础的可靠信息，可以在《Reading in the Brain》[4]中找到，作者是一位做过大量阅读能力神经影像学研究的科学家，这本书通俗易懂而且非常有趣。[1] http://assessingpsyche.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/strawman-spe... [2] http://www.psych.umn.edu/research/areas/pib/…
…the relevant populations are still grossly inadequate for backing up conclusions like that. P.S. Reliable information about the neurological underpinnings of reading ability can be found in the book Reading in the Brain,[4] by a scientist who has done many neuro-imaging studies of reading ability, a very readable and interesting book. [1] http://assessingpsyche.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/strawman-spe... [2] http://www.psych.umn.edu/research/areas/pib/…
得有更多的复现实验我才会相信。想了解近期基于科研成果对阅读机制的靠谱阐述，可以看看《Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention》http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Brain-Science-Evolution-Invent...。
Needs a lot more replication before I'll believe it. See Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Brain-Science-Evolution-Invent... for a good recent, research-based account of how reading works.