
国王的人马
All the King's Men
Robert Penn Warren · 初版 1946 年
9人推荐
9位读者提及
9次提及
故事围绕出身卑微的圆滑政客Willie Stark展开,其原型为现实中的路易斯安那州州长Huey Long;但真正的主角是记者Jack Burden,他作为叙述者串联起整个故事以及Stark攫取权力的崛起之路。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

All the King's Men
Robert Penn Warren · 初版 1946 年
故事围绕出身卑微的圆滑政客Willie Stark展开,其原型为现实中的路易斯安那州州长Huey Long;但真正的主角是记者Jack Burden,他作为叙述者串联起整个故事以及Stark攫取权力的崛起之路。
正在加载完整评论……
我在这里列了六本:http://jseliger.com/top-five-books :这些书绝对值得立刻去读:1. 《Lord of the Rings》 2. 《All the King’s Men》 3. 《High Fidelity》 4. 《Get Shorty》 5. 《Cryptonomicon》 6. Robertson Davies 的几乎任何作品,不过我建议从《The Deptford Trilogy》开始读,跳过《The Salterton Trilogy》
I listed six here: http://jseliger.com/top-five-books : These books are worth reading immediately: 1. Lord of the Rings 2. All the King’s Men 3. High Fidelity 4. Get Shorty 5. Cryptonomicon 6. Almost anything by Robertson Davies, though I recommend starting with The Deptford Trilogy and skipping The Salterton Trilogy
……阿贝尔森、萨斯曼的《计算机程序的构造和解释》(SICP);格雷迪·布奇(Grady Booch)的《面向对象分析与设计》;阿瑟·柯斯勒的《中午的黑暗》;阿瑟·柯斯勒的《夜间贼盗》;罗伯特·佩恩·沃伦的《国王的人马》;赛珍珠的《大地》;安托万·德·圣-埃克苏佩里的《小王子》;列夫·托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》;佩列温的《恰巴耶夫与虚空》
…Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, by Abelson, Sussman Object Oriented Analysis and Design by Grady Booch Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler Thieves in the Night by Arthur Koestler All the King's Men by Robert Penn Warren The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. War and Peace by L.N.Tolstoy Chapaev and the void by Pelevin
罗伯特·佩恩·沃伦取材自休伊·朗生平的小说《国王的人马》,写得太神了。
"All The King's Men," Robert Penn Warren's fictionalized treatment of Huey Long, is magnificent.
想看关于争议性民粹政客的纯文学小说,推荐读罗伯特·佩恩·沃伦的《国王的人马》。
For a very literary novel on a dubious populist politician, read All the King's Men by Robert Penn Warren.
罗伯特·佩恩·沃伦的《国王的人马》。
"All the King's Men" by Robert Penn Warren.
《国王的人马》里有一段写得很美的话,在我看来表达了类似的观点:“你年轻时的朋友是你一生中唯一能拥有的朋友,因为他并没有真正看清你……也许他从未看清过你。他眼中的你,只不过是那……
There's a beautiful passage in All The King's Men that makes, to me, a similar point: "The friend of your youth is the only friend you will ever have, for he does not really see you...and perhaps he never saw you. What he saw was simply part of the…