耶路撒冷的艾希曼

Hacker News 上怎么说

• theworst · 2014 年

  推荐读读汉娜·阿伦特的《艾希曼在耶路撒冷》（Eichmann in Jerusalem）。阿伦特在谈到二战中的纳粹时就讨论了这个具体问题——在大多数情况下，体制的架构方式决定了根本不存在一个做决策的邪恶大魔头（evil overlord）。哪怕在纳粹内部，大多数……

  I recommend reading Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem". Arendt discusses this very issue WRT Nazis in WW2 -- in most cases, the systems are structured in such a way that there isn't an evil overlord making those decisions. Even amongst the Nazis, most…

• lukev · 2020 年

  ……可以引用的文献（二战以来的几乎所有政治哲学都在探讨这个），但结合当前的讨论，我推荐波普尔的《开放社会及其敌人》（The Open Society and its Enemies），以及汉娜·阿伦特的《艾希曼在耶路撒冷：一份关于平庸之恶的报告》（Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil）。另外值得关注的历史研究还有：18世纪中叶对自由意志主义（libertarianism）的支持，是如何与基于种族的奴隶制最残酷的高峰期恰好重合的。……

  …to cite (it has been the focus of basically all political philosophy from WW2 forward) but relevant to this discussion, I can recommend Popper's "The Open Society and its Enemies", and Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil". Also of interest are historical treatments of how support of libertarianism in the mid-18th century could coincide with the most brutal zenith of race-based slavery.…

• pretoriusB · 2012 年

  ……从没有任何解释力的角度来说，“邪恶”这个概念毫无用处。也就是说，“他为什么要那么做？因为他很邪恶”纯属扯淡。也许这本书能说服你：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem 。汉娜·阿伦特在书中描述了我们所认为的像大屠杀（Holocaust）这种“历史上的滔天大罪”，并非是由“邪恶”之徒（狂热分子等）执行的，而是由那些“接受了既定前提”的普通人……

  …"evil" is useless in the sense that it doesn't have any explanatory power. That is, "Why did he do that? Because he was evil" is BS. Perhaps this book might convince you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem In it Hannah Arendt describes how what we perceive as "the great evils in history" like the Holocaust, were not executed by "evil" people (fanatics, etc), but by ordinary folks who "accepted the premises…

• exarch · 2013 年

  > 不专业，因为我们把政府的过错推到了员工个人的过错上。拿一个秘书来说吧。我建议读读并思考一下汉娜·阿伦特的名作《艾希曼在耶路撒冷：一份关于平庸之恶的报告》，换个角度看这个问题。在我们通常的观念里，作恶者都是那种居心险恶、捻着八字胡怪笑的超级大反派。而极具讽刺意味的现实是……

  >Unprofessional because we put the government's fault onto an employee's fault. Let's take a secretary. I suggest reading and considering Hannah Arendt's famous work, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" for a different perspective on this. Our typical idea of a perpetrator of evil is this malicious, moustache-twirling, cackling super-villain. The reality of how very…

• undoware · 2021 年

  ……以及你在增加某些东西时不可能不同时剥夺某些东西。真理是“既揭示又遮蔽的”，因为在数学和硬科学之外，真理带有视角局限性。UX 工程师必读。2. 汉娜·阿伦特《艾希曼在耶路撒冷》。让我更透彻地理解了恶的运作机制。“邪恶”是个拿来随便乱扔挺顺口、也很适合拿来当愚蠢政治口号的词，但真正的恶可不是闹着玩的，它切实存在，而且长得根本不像……

  …and how you cannot add something without taking something away. Truth is "revealing and concealing" because it is, outside math and hard science, perspectival. Essential reading for UX engineers. 2. _Eichmann in Jerusalem_, Hannah Arendt. Made me wiser about how evil works. "Evil" is a fun word to throw around and lends itself to silly political slogans, but the real thing is no joke, is out there, and does not look like…

• delusional · 2026 年

  汉娜·阿伦特那本精彩绝伦的《艾希曼在耶路撒冷：一份关于平庸之恶的报告》，讲的恰恰就是这种观察。大屠杀的核心推手之一，似乎着迷的根本不是屠杀犹太人的影响或后果，而仅仅是……

  Hannah Arendt wrote the fantastic "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" about exactly this observation. That one of the principal enablers of the Holocaust seemed obsessed, not with the effects or outcomes of murdering Jews, but simply the…

正在加载完整评论……