理论我懂。我是在求能证明其正确性的实验证据线索。目前存在互相竞争的理论。其中一个有一定实证支持的理论来自 Michael Spivey 的《Continuity of Mind》http://www.amazon.com/Continuity-Mind-Oxford-Psychology/dp/0...。Spivey 写的一篇简短总结：http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2003/pdfs/3... 另一种同样依赖于……的方法
I know the theory. I'm asking for pointers to experimental evidence that it is true. There are competing theories. One of them, which is backed by some empirical evidence, is "Continuity of Mind" by Michael Spivey http://www.amazon.com/Continuity-Mind-Oxford-Psychology/dp/0... Short summary by Spivey: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2003/pdfs/3... Another approach, also relying…
……控制并不是什么新鲜事；在运动科学领域已经做了大量工作，比如杂耍以及其他形式的动态模式生成。可以参考 JAS Scott Kelso 的《Dynamic Patterns》，或者 Spivey 的《Continuity of Mind》，亦或是比较新的激进具身认知（Radical Embodied Cognition）领域。这是一种偏系统神经科学的方法，很受欢迎，但算不上颠覆性的突破。
…control is not new; much work has been done in the field of movement science e.g. juggling and other forms of dynamic pattern generation. See for example JAS Scott Kelso's Dynamic Patterns or Spivey's Continuity of Mind or the newish field of Radical Embodied Cognition. This is fairly systems neuroscience oriented approach much welcome, but not ground breaking.
我试着去找那篇论文的免费 PDF 版，但没能找到。不过，我找到了 Michael Spivey 和 Rick Dale 早期写的一篇：《ON THE CONTINUITY OF MIND: TOWARD A DYNAMICAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITION》（59 页，<http://www.cogstud.cornell.edu/spiveylab/PLM.pdf>）。
I tried to find a free PDF version of that paper, but no such luck. However, I found an earlier one by Michael Spivey and Rick Dale, ON THE CONTINUITY OF MIND: TOWARD A DYNAMICAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITION (59 pages, <http://www.cogstud.cornell.edu/spiveylab/PLM.pdf>).
理论我懂。我是在求能证明其正确性的实验证据线索。目前存在互相竞争的理论。其中一个有一定实证支持的理论来自 Michael Spivey 的《Continuity of Mind》http://www.amazon.com/Continuity-Mind-Oxford-Psychology/dp/0...。Spivey 写的一篇简短总结：http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2003/pdfs/3... 另一种同样依赖于……的方法
I know the theory. I'm asking for pointers to experimental evidence that it is true. There are competing theories. One of them, which is backed by some empirical evidence, is "Continuity of Mind" by Michael Spivey http://www.amazon.com/Continuity-Mind-Oxford-Psychology/dp/0... Short summary by Spivey: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/CSJarchive/Proceedings/2003/pdfs/3... Another approach, also relying…
……控制并不是什么新鲜事；在运动科学领域已经做了大量工作，比如杂耍以及其他形式的动态模式生成。可以参考 JAS Scott Kelso 的《Dynamic Patterns》，或者 Spivey 的《Continuity of Mind》，亦或是比较新的激进具身认知（Radical Embodied Cognition）领域。这是一种偏系统神经科学的方法，很受欢迎，但算不上颠覆性的突破。
…control is not new; much work has been done in the field of movement science e.g. juggling and other forms of dynamic pattern generation. See for example JAS Scott Kelso's Dynamic Patterns or Spivey's Continuity of Mind or the newish field of Radical Embodied Cognition. This is fairly systems neuroscience oriented approach much welcome, but not ground breaking.
我试着去找那篇论文的免费 PDF 版，但没能找到。不过，我找到了 Michael Spivey 和 Rick Dale 早期写的一篇：《ON THE CONTINUITY OF MIND: TOWARD A DYNAMICAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITION》（59 页，<http://www.cogstud.cornell.edu/spiveylab/PLM.pdf>）。
I tried to find a free PDF version of that paper, but no such luck. However, I found an earlier one by Michael Spivey and Rick Dale, ON THE CONTINUITY OF MIND: TOWARD A DYNAMICAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITION (59 pages, <http://www.cogstud.cornell.edu/spiveylab/PLM.pdf>).