计算机不能做什么

What computers can't do

Hubert L. Dreyfus · 初版 1972 年

5人推荐
23位读者提及
37次提及

为什么值得读

  • 从哲学切入揭示机器模拟人类认知时的根本盲点
  • 被誉为反思人工智能能力边界的经典基准文献
  • 有助于理解机器学习项目中认知层面的常见谬误

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 是的。休伯特·德雷福斯(Hubert Dreyfus)对 AI 的批评经受住了时间的考验,想要直接理解或反驳这些观点的人可以去读读《计算机不能做什么》(What Computers Can't Do,1972,1979),或者更推荐阅读更新后的重印版《计算机仍旧不能做什么》(What Computers Still Can't Do,1992)。他是一位海德格尔派哲学家,但你只需要知道:现代 AI 对 20 世纪的大批思想一无所知……

    Yes. The critiques of AI from Hubert Dreyfus have stood the test of time, those who want to understand or challenge them directly can read What Computers Can't Do (1972, 1979), or even better the updated reprint What Computers Still Can't Do (1992). He's a Heideggarian Philosopher but all you need to know is that modern AI is ignorant of vast swathes of 20th Century…

  • ……对我而言,因为这篇论文似乎是对机器学习项目为什么会失败的一次极好的全面审视,唯独漏掉了这个关键点。这个想法在《计算机不能做什么》(H. Dreyfus,1972)一书中探讨得最为透彻,在《计算机仍旧不能做什么》(H. Dreyfus,1992)中有所重述,并在《第一步谬误史》(A History of First Step Fallacies,H. Dreyfus,2012)中得到了很好的总结 [1]。最后,任何免费公开的论文……

    …for me as this paper appears to be a damn good stab at being a comprehensive review of why machine learning projects fail, except for missing this critical point. The idea is best explored in the book What Computers Can't Do (H.Dreyfus, 1972), recounted in the book What Computer's Still Can't Do (H.Dreyfus, 1992), and well summarized in A History of First Step Fallacies (H.Dreyfus, 2012) [1] Finally, any paper that's freely…

  • 思考 AI 局限性的黄金标准是赫伯特·德雷福斯(Herbert Dreyfus)的著作,特别是 1972 年出版的《计算机不能做什么:人工智能的局限》(What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence)、1992 年出版的修订版《计算机仍旧不能做什么:对人工理性的批判》(What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason),以及 1986 年的《心智超越机器》(Mind over Machine)。

    The gold standard for thinking about the limits of AI is the work of Herbert Dreyfus, specifically the books What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence published in 1972, and the revised What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, published in 1992, and Mind over Machine, from 1986.

  • ……事实。随着这股风潮持续,我们可能会听到诸如机器人取代科学家来生产关于各种现象的知识这种说法。关于对 AI 最深刻的批判,去看看加州大学伯克利分校哲学家休伯特·德雷福斯的书吧:《计算机不能做什么:对人工理性的批判》。

    …facts. As the fad continues, we may hear like robots replacing scientists to produce knowledge about various phenomena. For a best critique of AI, check the book by UCBerkeley philosopher Hubert Dreyfus: what computers can't do, a critique of artificial reason.

  • ……麻省理工的一位专研海德格尔的学者,他认为计算机系的同事们正在把海德格尔毕生批判的那种对认知的幼稚看法代码化。可以看看他的书《计算机不能做什么》、《在世存在》(Being-in-the-world),以及论文《为什么海德格尔式人工智能失败了,为什么修正它需要让它变得更加海德格尔》(大概是这名字)。一个基本论点是,人类普通的应变处理并不是……

    …MIT who specialized in Heidegger and argued that his colleagues in the CS department were codifying just the kind of naive views on cognition that Heidegger spent his life criticizing. See his books “What Computers Can’t Do”, “Being-in-the-world”, and the paper “Why Heideggerian AI Failed and Why Fixing It Would Require Making it More Heideggerian” (something like that). A basic point is that ordinary human coping does…

  • ……报告发布会的录像,麦卡锡(McCarthy)也在场并作了回应,网上也能看到 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yReDbeY7ZMU&list=PLhThm05V6b...]。最后我想提一下 70 年代的那本书《计算机不能做什么》及其 90 年代的重印版《计算机仍旧不能做什么》,想了解 AI 的现状、终极目标及其基本假设中的致命缺陷,读这两本就够了。事实上,它写于……

    …of the presentation of the report, with McCarthy present and responding, is available online also [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yReDbeY7ZMU&list=PLhThm05V6b...]. Finally I'd cite the 1970s era book What Computers Can't Do, and its 90s reprint, What Computers Still Can't Do as all you need to know about the current state of AI, its ultimate aims and the fatal flaws in its fundamental assumptions. The fact that it was written…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助