古埃及文学
Ancient Egyptian literature
Miriam Lichtheim · 初版 1973 年
3人推荐
5位读者提及
7次提及
“本书于1973年首次出版，其后于1976年推出Volume II、1980年推出Volume III，该选集已成为Egyptology领域的经典之作，描绘了世界上最早文明之一的文学形式的卓越演进。Volume I概述了埃及文学体裁早期且渐进的演变历程，包括铭刻于石碑上的传记与历史铭文、用笔书写在莎草纸上的各类文学作品，以及关注死后生界的mortuary literature。由Antonio Loprieno撰写新序。Volume II
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……那本书编排得很烂，而且跟我刚读完的那本苏美尔的书内容大同小异，倒也不算太意外，但天哪，那本书真的太差了。不过我是先读完了利希特海姆（Lichtheim）的三卷本《古埃及文学》（Ancient Egyptian Literature），可能嘴被养刁了吧。那套书虽然枯燥得要命，但比另外两本好太多了。它写得足够精彩，以至于多年之后我还能记住里面的不少细节和单篇作品，……
…Book was poorly put together and it was pretty much the same stuff as the Sumerian book I'd just finished, which wasn't a huge surprise but man that book is bad. I read all three volumes of Lichtheim's Ancient Egyptian Literature first, though, so that may have spoiled me. It's dry as hell but way better than either of those other volumes. Was good enough that I remember quite a few details and individual works from it years later,…
抱歉回复晚了，这几天比较忙。1) 利希特海姆的三卷本《古埃及文学》 2) 斯蒂芬·米切尔的《吉尔伽美什》 3) 布莱克等人的《古苏美尔文学》（The Literature of Ancient Sumer） 4) 福斯特的《来自遥远的日子》（From Distant Days，阿卡德语文献） 之后应该还有一些印度的重要著作，但我还没读到……
Sorry for the delay, busy few days. 1) The three volumes of Lichtheim's Ancient Egyptian Literature 2) Stephen Mitchell's Gilgamesh 3) Black et al, The Literature of Ancient Sumer 4) Foster's From Distant Days (Akkadian) After that there should be some major works from India, but I haven't gotten…
……古埃及历史所能期望的一切，甚至还要多——可能会对米里亚姆·利希特海姆（Miriam Lichtheim）的作品感兴趣。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miriam_Lichtheim 我手头有三卷本的《古埃及文学》，而且已经读完了。在西方和近东文学里，希腊时代之前的大部分东西读起来都极其怪异，很难摸着头脑，（我觉得）很大程度上是因为太多内容都脱离了当时的语境，……
…Ancient Egyptian history could want, and then some—might be interested in Miriam Lichtheim's work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miriam_Lichtheim I've got, and have read, the three-volume edition of Ancient Egyptian Literature. Almost everything before the Greeks, as far as Western and near-East literature, reads alien as hell and is pretty hard to get a grasp on, largely (I think) because so much of it exists absent context,…
我的书架是按作者第一部代表作的时间顺序排的（如果是合集，比如利希特海姆的《古埃及文学》，就按里面第一部作品的大致年代），所以我的书架本身就极具教学意义。哪怕我一时说不出某本书确切的成书时间，我大概也能想象出它在书架上的位置，把它锁定在“菲尔丁之后、狄更斯之前……在……之后
I arrange mine chronologically by author's first major work (or rough date of the first work in it in the case of collections, like Lichtheim's Ancient Egyptian Literature) so my very shelves are didactic. Even if I can't tell you exactly when a book was written I can probably imagine where it is on the shelves and pin it down to "after Fielding, before Dickens... after…
利希特海姆编纂了一套三卷本的《古埃及文学》，里面收录了大量铭文。我很赞同楼上 wl 的观点：如果你对极其枯燥的文字耐受度不高，还是别看了。几乎所有这种“流派”的东西都是“看了一篇就等于全看过了”……
Lichtheim edited a 3-volume "Ancient Egyptian Literature" which contains a lot of funerary inscriptions. I'd second wl's post above: if you don't have tolerance for really dull writing, avoid. Almost all of that "genre" is of the "seen one, seem them all"…
我敢肯定我读过最古老的东西大概有4500年历史了（虽然看的是译本，但也算吧）。就是利希特海姆《古埃及文学》的第一卷。那套三卷本里有几个没写完的故事，我真希望他们当年能用更稳定的存储介质，搞得我现在被硬生生卡在几千年前的“未完待续”里。
Pretty sure the oldest stuff I've read was around 4,500 years old (in translation, but still). Volume I of Lichtheim's Ancient Egyptian Literature. There are a couple incomplete tales in that 3-volume work and I really wish they'd had a more stable storage medium, because now I'm stuck with accidental millennia-old cliffhangers.