人工科学
The sciences of the artificial
Herbert Alexander Simon · 初版 1969 年
11人推荐
21位读者提及
27次提及
为什么值得读
- 提出将设计视作关于人造物的科学
- 跳出畅销书套路，理论底蕴深厚启发性强
- 奠定人工智能与认知科学早期探索的重要视野
概述了一项旨在为通常处于自然科学范畴之外的人造物发展科学体系的研究纲领。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
The sciences of the artificial
Herbert Alexander Simon · 初版 1969 年
概述了一项旨在为通常处于自然科学范畴之外的人造物发展科学体系的研究纲领。
正在加载完整评论……
来点不是科普/商业类的书怎么样？我可能有点个人偏好，因为我很喜欢心理学的这个领域。- Simon 的《The Sciences of the Artificial》- Davidson & Sternberg 的《The Psychology of Problem Solving》- Ericsson、Charness、Feltovich 等人的《The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology)》…
How about some books that aren't pop-sci / business books? I am kind of biased, since I love this area of psychology. - The Sciences of the Artificial by Simon - The Psychology of Problem Solving by Davidson & Sternberg - The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology) by Ericsson, Charness, Feltovich…
……似乎确实如此，所以越是容易理解，大家就越倾向于说它不是 AI。我挺喜欢你评论里把它归结为设计本质的切入点——Herb Simon 在《The Sciences of the Artificial》里给设计下过一个很好的定义，而这个系统似乎就是在做设计。不是在画画，而是在设计。
…seems to be, so the more it's understandable, the more people tend to claim it isn't AI. I like how your comment pins this on the nature of designing -- Herb Simon gives a good definition of design in "sciences of the artificial" and this system seems to be designing. Not drawing, but designing.
……为 LISP 奠定了基础，并为他们赢得了图灵奖（McCarthy 自己也拿了一个）。他们是 AI 的奠基人，还实现过一些非常漂亮的软件，比如通用问题求解器（General Problem Solver）。可以看看 Simon 的《The Sciences of the Artificial》或者他的诺贝尔奖演讲，以及 Newell 的《Unified Theories of Cognition》。
…setting the stage for LISP and earning them a Turing award (McCarthy got his own). They were founders of AI and implemented some really neat software like the General Problem Solver. See Simon's "The Sciences of the Artificial" or his Nobel prize lecture, and "Unified Theories of Cognition" by Newell.
两本都超级启发人：Doug Engelbart 1962 年的《Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework》http://www.invisiblerevolution.net/engelbart/62_paper_top.ht... 以及 Herbert Simon 的《The Sciences of the Artificial》http://www.amazon.com/Sciences-Artificial-Herbert-Simon/dp/0...
Both inspiring: Doug Engelbart's 1962 "Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework" http://www.invisiblerevolution.net/engelbart/62_paper_top.ht... Herbert Simon's "The Sciences of the Artificial" http://www.amazon.com/Sciences-Artificial-Herbert-Simon/dp/0...
如果想要更偏向“事物如何运作”这一面的设计研究视角，我喜欢 Herb Simon 的经典之作《The Sciences of the Artificial》，它把设计构想为人造物的科学。我也挺喜欢 Nigel Cross 的东西。他的《Designerly Ways of Knowing》（2006）很棒，但出版的版本贵得离谱，而且还是仅供图书馆采购的……
For a design-studies take even more on the "how things work" side, I like Herb Simon's classic The Sciences of the Artificial, which conceives of design as a science of man-made artifacts. I also like Nigel Cross's stuff. His book Designerly Ways of Knowing (2006) is good but published in some absurdly expensive, for-libraries-only…
……截然分开（尤其是架构/建筑学把这两者深度结合了起来），但有些书显然更偏向其中一侧。在我看来，工程设计这一侧有两本好书：Herb Simon 的经典著作《Sciences of the Artificial》，它从一个试图搞清设计本质的 AI 研究者视角切入，一方面是想把它发展成一门设计科学，另一方面也是着眼于将模型形式化……
…clean split (architecture in particular strongly combines the two), but some books are clearly more on one side or the other. For the engineering-design side, two good books, imo: Herb Simon's classic Sciences of the Artificial, which approaches design from the lens of an AI researcher trying to figure out what design really is, partly to develop it into a science of design, and partly with an eye towards formalizing a model…