…made science a relativized discipline. Polanyi lectured on this topic for decades before Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." [2] If you haven't checked out Polanyi yet, look up The Tacit Dimension — a very short book that talks about "tacit knowledge" (also discussed in uky.edu page, with attribution). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn#Polanyi%E2%80%93Ku...
I consider Michael Polanyi's works to be very important in a certain way. MP's The Tacit Dimension (1966, ~120pp) is a good introduction to his ideas about "Tacit knowledge", i.e. 'we can know more than we can tell', e.g. facial recognition. , A quick and enjoyable read that might appeal to many in…
…often often refer to a very complex natural environment we must also perceive and comprehend. That amazing capability was not constructed. For a shorter intro to Polanyi's thoughts, try 1964 book The Tacit Dimension. Not ruling out AGI as possible. The question is whether we will be able to communicate with it if its referents are very different from ours. And then there's the question: why would it cooperate rather…
Polanyi's work "The Tacit Dimension" is one of my favorites! You can teach calligraphy fundamentals, the principles of hardness and grinding, but it's hard to tell someone how to use a pencil to write. You never think of how you use it…
……让科学成了一门相对化的学科。在 Kuhn 发表《The Structure of Scientific Revolutions》（科学革命的结构）之前的几十年里，Polanyi 就一直在就这个话题发表演讲。”[2] 如果你还没读过 Polanyi，去看看《The Tacit Dimension》吧——一本很薄的书，讲的是“tacit knowledge”（默会知识，uky.edu 页面上也讨论过，并注明了出处）。[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn#Polanyi%E2%80%93Ku...
…made science a relativized discipline. Polanyi lectured on this topic for decades before Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." [2] If you haven't checked out Polanyi yet, look up The Tacit Dimension — a very short book that talks about "tacit knowledge" (also discussed in uky.edu page, with attribution). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn#Polanyi%E2%80%93Ku...
《The Tacit Dimension》，Michael Polanyi，1966 年 https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo603536... 编程与默会知识（Programming and Tacit Knowledge）https://mbuffett.com/posts/all-tacit-knowledge/ Tacit Knowledge 系列博文，……
The Tacit Dimension, Michael Polanyi, 1966 https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo603536... Programming and Tacit Knowledge https://mbuffett.com/posts/all-tacit-knowledge/ Tacit Knowledge blogpost series,…
我觉得 Michael Polanyi 的著作在某种程度上极其重要。MP 的《The Tacit Dimension》（1966 年，约 120 页）是对其“tacit knowledge”（默会知识）思想很好的入门介绍，也就是“我们知道的远比能说出来的多”，比如人脸识别。读起来很快很享受，可能会吸引许多在……的人。
I consider Michael Polanyi's works to be very important in a certain way. MP's The Tacit Dimension (1966, ~120pp) is a good introduction to his ideas about "Tacit knowledge", i.e. 'we can know more than we can tell', e.g. facial recognition. , A quick and enjoyable read that might appeal to many in…
Michael Polanyi 的《The Tacit Dimension》是理解这一概念很好的切入点。
Michael Polanyi's "The Tacit Dimension" is a good starting point on the concept.
……往往指的是一个非常复杂的自然环境，我们也必须去感知和理解它。那种惊人的能力并非人为构建出来的。如果想简明了解 Polanyi 的思想，可以读读 1964 年的书《The Tacit Dimension》。并不排除 AGI 是可能的。问题在于，如果它的指涉物与我们的截然不同，我们还能否与它沟通。另外还有一个问题：它凭什么配合而不是……
…often often refer to a very complex natural environment we must also perceive and comprehend. That amazing capability was not constructed. For a shorter intro to Polanyi's thoughts, try 1964 book The Tacit Dimension. Not ruling out AGI as possible. The question is whether we will be able to communicate with it if its referents are very different from ours. And then there's the question: why would it cooperate rather…
Polanyi 的著作《The Tacit Dimension》是我的最爱之一！你能教别人书法基本功、硬度与研磨的原理，但你很难向别人解释到底该如何用铅笔写字。你平时根本不会去想自己是怎么握笔使劲的……
Polanyi's work "The Tacit Dimension" is one of my favorites! You can teach calligraphy fundamentals, the principles of hardness and grinding, but it's hard to tell someone how to use a pencil to write. You never think of how you use it…