……气流在上表面和下表面之间发生分离的位置并不在上翼面前缘，而是在下表面的某个地方。看这张图：http://www.arvelgentry.com/images/plate2.jpg 这家伙在发这种误导人的文章之前，真该去读读雅培（Abbott）和冯·多恩霍夫（Van Doenhoff）写的《翼型理论》（Theory of Wing Sections）（http://www.amazon.co.uk/Theory-Sections-Dover-Books-Physics/...）。抱歉我有点发飙，但我实在不想看到有人把这家伙写的东西当真……
…where the flow separates between upper and lower surface is not at the leading, but somewhere on the lower surface. See this image: http://www.arvelgentry.com/images/plate2.jpg This guy should read "Theory of Wing Sections", by Abbbott and Van Doenhoff (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Theory-Sections-Dover-Books-Physics/...) before posting misleading essays. Sorry about the rant, but I don't want anyone taking what this guy writes…
For anyone really interested, this is the authoritative reference for NACA, etc. airfoils. Theory of Wing Sections by Abbott and von Doenhoff (1959) https://www.amazon.com/Theory-Wing-Sections-Aeronautical-Eng...
……气流在上表面和下表面之间发生分离的位置并不在上翼面前缘，而是在下表面的某个地方。看这张图：http://www.arvelgentry.com/images/plate2.jpg 这家伙在发这种误导人的文章之前，真该去读读雅培（Abbott）和冯·多恩霍夫（Van Doenhoff）写的《翼型理论》（Theory of Wing Sections）（http://www.amazon.co.uk/Theory-Sections-Dover-Books-Physics/...）。抱歉我有点发飙，但我实在不想看到有人把这家伙写的东西当真……
…where the flow separates between upper and lower surface is not at the leading, but somewhere on the lower surface. See this image: http://www.arvelgentry.com/images/plate2.jpg This guy should read "Theory of Wing Sections", by Abbbott and Van Doenhoff (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Theory-Sections-Dover-Books-Physics/...) before posting misleading essays. Sorry about the rant, but I don't want anyone taking what this guy writes…
给真正感兴趣的人参考，这是关于 NACA 等机翼翼型的权威参考书。雅培与冯·多恩霍夫著《翼型理论》（1959年版）https://www.amazon.com/Theory-Wing-Sections-Aeronautical-Eng...
For anyone really interested, this is the authoritative reference for NACA, etc. airfoils. Theory of Wing Sections by Abbott and von Doenhoff (1959) https://www.amazon.com/Theory-Wing-Sections-Aeronautical-Eng...