The Radar Handbook by Merrill Skolnik often comes up as a basic reference covering some of these topics, radar and radio being intimately related. Plus the pdf is usually around: http://airspot.ru/book/file/961/radar_handbook.pdf
I'm sure the OP has already read his Skolnik given his comment but for those following along that's usually the best place to start. https://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Third-Merrill-Skolnik/...
…collide are moving in three dimensions, step 2 is hard to do accurately. (Unless you've studied radar tracking, you probably don't appreciate exactly how hard, but if you're genuinely interested, Skolnik's Radar Handbook is a good place to start.) The less accurate you are at step 2, the harder steps 3, 4, and 5 become, because you have to deal with more uncertainty. Is that really where the other object is? Is that…
…Library qsort function. My algorithm text of choice was Skolnik[1], not CLRS. Guess I wasn't writing software for a living. Plenty of SV companies sure got that impression. [1] http://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Edition-Merrill-Skolnik...
…fanboyism. >Your point about complicated mathematical equations lies at the root problem of you "unified engineering" guys. You clearly don't know what you're talking about here. Go read Skolnik's Radar Handbook, then try to tell me with a straight face that random processes are going to derive those equations for you, and somehow magically come up with a way to sidestep the basic reality that they have to be…
梅里尔·斯科尼克（Merrill Skolnik）的《雷达手册》（The Radar Handbook）经常被作为涵盖这些主题的基础参考书提及，毕竟雷达和无线电关系极为紧密。而且网上通常能找到 PDF：http://airspot.ru/book/file/961/radar_handbook.pdf
The Radar Handbook by Merrill Skolnik often comes up as a basic reference covering some of these topics, radar and radio being intimately related. Plus the pdf is usually around: http://airspot.ru/book/file/961/radar_handbook.pdf
看楼主的评论，我敢肯定他肯定读过 Skolnik 的书了，但对于跟着看帖的人来说，那通常是最好的入门切入点。https://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Third-Merrill-Skolnik/...
I'm sure the OP has already read his Skolnik given his comment but for those following along that's usually the best place to start. https://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Third-Merrill-Skolnik/...
…碰撞的物体是在三维空间中运动的，步骤 2 很难做到精确。（除非你研究过雷达跟踪，否则你可能体会不到到底有多难，但如果你真感兴趣，Skolnik 的《雷达手册》（Radar Handbook）是个不错的入门选择。）你在步骤 2 越不准确，步骤 3、4、5 就会越艰难，因为你必须应对更多的不确定性。另一个物体真的在那里吗？那是不是…
…collide are moving in three dimensions, step 2 is hard to do accurately. (Unless you've studied radar tracking, you probably don't appreciate exactly how hard, but if you're genuinely interested, Skolnik's Radar Handbook is a good place to start.) The less accurate you are at step 2, the harder steps 3, 4, and 5 become, because you have to deal with more uncertainty. Is that really where the other object is? Is that…
…库里的 qsort 函数。我当时首选的算法教材是 Skolnik[1]，而不是 CLRS（算法导论）。估计当时我不是靠写软件谋生的吧。很多硅谷（SV）公司确实也是这么觉得的。[1] http://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Edition-Merrill-Skolnik...
…Library qsort function. My algorithm text of choice was Skolnik[1], not CLRS. Guess I wasn't writing software for a living. Plenty of SV companies sure got that impression. [1] http://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Edition-Merrill-Skolnik...
…无脑吹。>你关于复杂数学方程的观点，正是你们搞“统一工程”的人的根本问题所在。你在这里显然不知道自己在扯什么。去读读 Skolnik 的《雷达手册》（Radar Handbook），然后再板着脸跟我说随机过程能替你推导出那些方程，还能变魔术般地绕开那个基本事实——它们必须…
…fanboyism. >Your point about complicated mathematical equations lies at the root problem of you "unified engineering" guys. You clearly don't know what you're talking about here. Go read Skolnik's Radar Handbook, then try to tell me with a straight face that random processes are going to derive those equations for you, and somehow magically come up with a way to sidestep the basic reality that they have to be…
Skolnik: http://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Edition-Merrill-Skolnik...
Skolnik: http://www.amazon.com/Radar-Handbook-Edition-Merrill-Skolnik...