…who can be pedagogical while keeping and increasing your interest in the topic, much akin to Feynman, in his works which disentangle the works of previous philosophers: Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962), Kant's Critical Philosophy (1963), Proust and Signs (1964), Bergsonism (1966), Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (1981), Foucault (1986), The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (1988). The aforementioned, What Is Philosophy? is also extremely…
……胡塞尔，所以我跑去读内格尔（Nagel）的那篇“作为一只蝙蝠是什么感觉”（what's it like to be a bat）。我得说，很显然斯蒂芬森在准备写《飞越修道院》（Anathem）时研读了他的康德；作为面向普通外行介绍康德批判哲学（Kant's critical philosophy）的基础入门读物，这本书相当不错。
…Husserl, so Nagel was what I went to with "what's it like to be a bat". I will say it's very clear that Stephenson read his Kant when prepping to write Anathem; as a basic layperson's introduction to Kant's critical philosophy, the book is quite good.
…sister kind of... selectively edited. It's a whole thing. Regardless, IMHO it's a good take. Reasonable people may disagree. In order, they're "Empiricism and Subjectivity," "Nietzsche and Philosophy," "Kant’s Critical Philosophy," "Proust and Signs," "Bergsonism," "Spinoza: Practical Philosophy," "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature," "Francis Bacon: Logic of Sensation," and "Foucault." That is... a lot. IMHO, Nietzche, Spinoza,…
……能做到既循循善诱，又能保持并激发你对该话题的兴趣，非常像费曼，这体现在他梳理前人哲学体系的那些著作中：《尼采与哲学》（1962）、《康德的批判哲学》（1963）、《普鲁斯特与符号》（1964）、《柏格森主义》（1966）、《斯宾诺莎：实践哲学》（1981）、《福柯》（1986）、《褶子：莱布尼茨与巴洛克》（1988）。前面提到的《什么是哲学？》也是极其……
…who can be pedagogical while keeping and increasing your interest in the topic, much akin to Feynman, in his works which disentangle the works of previous philosophers: Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962), Kant's Critical Philosophy (1963), Proust and Signs (1964), Bergsonism (1966), Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (1981), Foucault (1986), The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (1988). The aforementioned, What Is Philosophy? is also extremely…
……胡塞尔，所以我跑去读内格尔（Nagel）的那篇“作为一只蝙蝠是什么感觉”（what's it like to be a bat）。我得说，很显然斯蒂芬森在准备写《飞越修道院》（Anathem）时研读了他的康德；作为面向普通外行介绍康德批判哲学（Kant's critical philosophy）的基础入门读物，这本书相当不错。
…Husserl, so Nagel was what I went to with "what's it like to be a bat". I will say it's very clear that Stephenson read his Kant when prepping to write Anathem; as a basic layperson's introduction to Kant's critical philosophy, the book is quite good.
……妹妹有点……选择性地编辑过了。这事儿挺复杂的。无论如何，在我看来（IMHO）这是个很好的解读。仁者见仁智者见智吧。按顺序来说，它们是《经验主义与主体性》、《尼采与哲学》、《康德的批判哲学》、《普鲁斯特与符号》、《柏格森主义》、《斯宾诺莎：实践哲学》、《卡夫卡：走向少数文学》、《弗朗西斯·培根：感觉的逻辑》以及《福柯》。这……真是一大堆。在我看来，尼采、斯宾诺莎……
…sister kind of... selectively edited. It's a whole thing. Regardless, IMHO it's a good take. Reasonable people may disagree. In order, they're "Empiricism and Subjectivity," "Nietzsche and Philosophy," "Kant’s Critical Philosophy," "Proust and Signs," "Bergsonism," "Spinoza: Practical Philosophy," "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature," "Francis Bacon: Logic of Sensation," and "Foucault." That is... a lot. IMHO, Nietzche, Spinoza,…